WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 18 pts

Medical practice is absolutely a ritual. We may no longer call them shaman or witch doctors, but modern physicians are the same cult of personality as the tribal medicine man of the past. This video really does show how this tribal cultism is still alive today. It seems we can't escape it because too many people just want to worship the medical priests rather than think critically and honestly about how the world really is. This is a really sad affair and I don't think it will get any better in the future without a new type of priest for the simple minded masses to worship.

Shaman Fauci: You must wear the deer feces on your face to ward off the evil spirits that give you fevers until we can make a new potion to grow good spirits inside you and battle the evil spirits. Two moons to stop the spread of the evil spirits. And don't share teepees or stand closer than two rattlesnakes apart.

[–] 4 pts

We have learned so much about human nature in the last 5 years. 5 years ago if I were to have read your analysis I would have lauged at you. Now, it is just how our nervous system is wired.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

One example of that is pregnant mothers all getting sonograms of their babies. There have been voices from physicians warning about long term problems for the child, but they are drowned out by the "magic" of the baby's blurry image the Mother can share on FB, ticktok or whatever. It's become part of the experience based solely on magical thinking. "We can see problems" is the fear the lay on the Mother. How many of the millions born actually have a problem before birth that can be detected?

[–] 1 pt

I had only one major health issue until now: I badly dislocated my shoulder while playing ice hockey. I was miserable for years afterwards because the shoulder would pop out again and again while doing the silliest things. The problem was diagnosed using MRT and fixed with minimally invasive surgery. The recovery was incredible and I never had a problem with my shoulder ever again. I'm happy with modern medicine. Don't confuse it with the politicized clot jab.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Modern medicine is good at fixing physical things that are broken, such broken bones, where you can see clearly see what is wrong and can evaluate the result of their intervention afterwards.

However, beware if they tell you that something is wrong that you can't see (such as a test result) or have no ability to evaluate yourself, and especially if you have no symptoms. That's potentially (likely?) quackery.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I second this sentiment. The broken bones or torn ligaments aren't symptoms of a disease. They're ailments with a single direction for repairments, which is to realign or reattach them. I will not hesitate to go to a hospital for the needed surgeries.

On the other hand, if I ever get struck with a terminal illness, I'm never gonna set a foot inside a hospital. I'm taking pain killers until l pass surrounded by loved ones.

[–] 0 pt

My kid would be dead without modern medicine. It's hard science, not ritual.

[–] 1 pt

The point is that it can be both. The message shouldn't be that all modern tech and medicine is bullshit - it clearly isn't. It's that the average person is no different than someone who followed a witch doctor 5k years ago.

There are huge elements of religion caught up in it all. You will never be able to logically show a normal person their doctor is wrong, because they BELIEVE, not because they're logical and reviewed the literature.

You could probably argue it's the politicization of medicine and the modern structure of authority (FDA, WHO, etc) that is the real issue. No one is trying to say science doesn't exist. He's saying The Science is a religion.

[–] 0 pt

In medicine you are required to have confidence in your doctors ability to a degree. It can't be expected that common folk be experts on cancer, organ transplants, etc., before making a decision on their health. Specialization requires a degree of confidence in the specialist. Otherwise we would have to do and know everything ourselves. It's not religion or ritual. it's either trust or distrust in the medical system through the experiences you've had with it. When you order your favorite steak a restaurant, you trust its going to be great like it usually is. That doesn't require you to know where the beef was procured, how it was stored, what seasoning was used, what temp it was cooked at etc. It's just trust in the system through experience.

That's a big "it" you've got there! (in "It's hard science...")

Is the doctor who is refusing to treat unvaccinated a "hard scientist?"

[–] 0 pt

No, not necessarily, but the medical field he works in is based on hard science.

[–] 6 pts

Damn that was good stuff

[–] 5 pts

Wow. Good stuff. Saved

[–] 5 pts (edited )

I never understood aids. Is he saying that people of risk recieved false positive HIV tests and then were killed by the treatments? Matt from quantum of conscience calls the glazed over denial look a download. Its true.

[–] 4 pts

HIV doesn't cause AIDS, the HIV tests are BS. Once you have an HIV positive diagnosis you are put on drugs that have side effects that are indecipherable from AIDS.

[–] 1 pt

It's definitely also caused by gay sex, whether or not there is a virus involved.

[–] 1 pt

Fascinating. I had heard people entertain the thought, a long time ago, but it's quite a controversial topic.

Do you have any study materials that you'd recommend checking out?

[–] 0 pt

Dr. Peter Duesberg was the preeminent expert on retroviruses, and he is a good source of information on why AIDS is not caused by the retrovirus HIV.

[–] 1 pt

Why did people get AIDS before there were any HIV drugs?

[–] 0 pt

Because immune system problems can be caused by a number of things. For instance, gay men who constantly engage in anal sex (semen in your anus causes immune problems even according to mainstream science), constantly get STDs, constantly treat those STDs with various drugs, and do party drugs like "poppers" will end up with immune problems. That's why most of the initial cases were in gay men who had had sex with literally hundreds or thousands of men. Intravenous drug users can also have immune problems when they inject adulterated drugs into their veins. People who repeatedly get blood transfusions can end up with immune problems for the same reason that organ transplant recipients can.

My claim is not that all immune problems in AIDS patients were caused by AIDS drugs, but if a healthy person is falsely given an HIV positive diagnosis they will be given drugs that are toxic and will induce AIDS like symptoms.

[–] 2 pts

AIDS is a broad set of symptoms caused by a compromised immune system. Gay men have “aids” because they are walking Petri dishes.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I like this "we live in the best possible world" explanation. That IS how they think as it allows them to explain away and justify any and all atrocities because they are being done "for the greater good".

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yUpbOliTHJY

[–] 10 pts

It also means they can ignore very recent events, such as the Tuskegee Experiments.

"Well we live in the best possible world NOW, we wouldn't do that NOW, we only USED TO do that."

[–] 4 pts

This time, it's different.

[–] 5 pts

Yeah it definitely will be when this shit goes up in flames. Niggers are already the lowest vaxxed per 100,000.

Never thought i'd see myself fighting beside a nigger

How about an anti-COVID vaxxer?

Aye I could do that.

Still gonna send them back though.

[–] 1 pt

Hell, you don't even have to go that far back. Look into the "Pandemrix" vaccine. Prime example of why vaccines shouldn't be rushed.

It's so disingenuous when I see pro vaxxers argue that these 'vaccines' have been in development for 20+ years.

[–] 1 pt

They stopped using that vaccine after perhaps two dozen adverse events. Meanwhile you have hundreds of thousands as a result of the clot shots for the wubonic plague and it's business as normal.

[–] 3 pts

Jonestown Massacre - How did they get everyone to drink the Kool-aid?

As people were screaming in agony as they died, everyone else continued to line up and drink the poison. Parents poured poison down their children's throats, and then held their children in their arms as they died a horrifically painful death. Other parents watched that and then did the same to their own children without question; without hesitation. Why?

Because it was all rehearsed multiple times. Because everyone else was doing it without question; without hesitation.

More than 900 people died. There were some survivors who were away from the compound or other various reasons. But only 1 person, only one, saw what was happening and ran away. All others, over 900 of them, knew what would happen and they did it anyway.

When it comes to the vax - This is only the first round. There will be yearly (or monthly) boosters. People will die. People will know that they're going to die, they will know their children will die, and they will do it anyways. Just like in Jonestown.

[–] 2 pts

What happened to Liam? What I am reading sounds like suicide but it's not saying suicide.

[–] 0 pt

Where are you seeing this information?

[–] 2 pts

Fauci, fucker is dead in minecraft

This is literally spelled out perfectly in the Old Testament.

God kept trying to give his people the truth, and they kept running back to their fallen angel idols.

My ritual is religiously going to the gym.

[–] 1 pt

Excellent observations. I find it similar to the blue pill/red pill dichotomy in society. Most people have buy into the societal norms and narratives (blue pill) because it's easy and comforting. They are unable to even acknowledge that the foundations of their beliefs are a mirage, or that a "red pill" even exists.

And when confronted with facts that would shake those beliefs, they instinctively defend with faith-based dogma. If you push the issue, they will become agitated and even violent. Anyone who has tried to convince a family member of a "red pill" issue can relate. Telling someone their child might have autism because of vaccines is about as controversial as walking into a catholic church during mass and declaring that Jesus was a fraud.

(I do not recommend doing either of those things)

Load more (6 replies)