The issue you're having is your ignoring the chemical reaction that takes place once it's introduced to the body. It ceases to be fluoride once the chemical reaction takes place, it becomes flouroapetite. Which is a mineralized substance. Secondly the test WAS given with the care, the trials were done in areas that did not have naturally occurring fluoride in the water wells. And it is regulated to ensure it is intact. 7 MG per liter. And finally there's no such thing as concentrated fluoride levels in juice. One liter is one liter is one liter and .7 MG etc... it took 2 decades to publish the findings which all began with a noticeable difference in Tooth decay levels from populations that already had naturally occurring fluoride in the water vs. No fluoride. It was carefully done research program done with adherence to the scientific method that underwent peer review. And finally 95% of all toothpaste sold is fluoridated which means it's safe to assume in the regulated water levels won't cause excess fluoride. Toddlers have eaten entire tunes of toothpaste which is 2,000 times more concentrated than water with no fatal effects. Dose makes the poison. Too much fluoride will kill you, yes. So will too much water without fluoride, so will too much oxygen, so will too many apple seeds. You're complete disregard that what is in your body is NOT sodium silicofluoride once the chemical reaction is complete is wilful ignorance on your part.
Why does my toothpaste say not to swallow. Why do fluoride pills say the same. It's toxic. Film yourself eating a bottle of fluoride pills.
And finally there's no such thing as concentrated fluoride levels in juice
If fluoridated water is cooked down, the end result is water with higher concentrations of flouride. Concentrated juice is made with municipal water (which has flouride) cooked down. I know I have called the companies of ocenspray juice and v8 juice.
I am gonna look into flouroapetite, but regardless flouride is added as a medicine and as I posted with sources earlier, it is medically unethical; which was the point I originally made, That you refuted.
As far as flouroapatite being nothing to worry about, where does skeletalflourosis come into play if it is harmless?
Toothpaste is 2000x more concentrated that a liter of water. And you can eat a tube of toothpaste with a low risk of any life threatening issues. Which means you would need the concentration 2000 liters of water into a juice drink you can drink in one sitting to have a snowballs chance of injuring someone. So that's a an irrelevant point. You would have to actively go out of your way to consume dangerous amounts of fluoride just like you'd need to actively try to poison yourself with water. Use your head. And unethical is clearly subjective when it was approved by the public, rigorously tested, regulated, and made dramatic increases in oral health all across the country. But hey.
The point is that it is medically unethical under the nuremburg code.
It is added as a medicine.
The administration and close observation of the patient is not closely observed and regulated.
The addition of flouride to municipal water systems violates the nuremburg code.
(post is archived)