And what part was violated? The part where the initial experiments were voted on by the first cities to try it? The decades of data before it became standard? Or the fact that it was voted on and approved by the majority of the population? Which part specifically can you site that is a violation?
It's cute you think voting works?
Did the majority vote for the 1965 immigration act? Did we vote for the war on drugs? Did we vote to go to Iraq and Afghanistan based in the 9/11 attacks!
Did we vote pedo joe biden and the hoe into office?
Your funny
Nice way to dodge the questions. Incredulity alert. Maybe actually read the process involved in fluoridated water, how it was decided when and where, and the final findings of the data after decades long research. Again site your claim or your claim is dismissed.
You're examples are a red herring fallacy, I didn't ask about that, I pointed out that it was voted on. That can't be disputed, and less than 10% was against it in the initial trials and dozens of these morons started calling in with "issues caused by the flouride" BEFORE it was even introduced.
And then how do we make decisions on public health? Only from sources you like?
Why do you insist on medicating water, why fluoride out of all possibilities. Why not lithium, vitamins, calcium. Why is it so important to you that you ingest fluoride. Cause it helps muh teeth science says so. Science is bought and corrupted like every other god damn institution.
Just because people didnt know about it or have access yo information about flouride 70 years ago when it was ‘voted’ on doesnt mean we all have to drink the poison. Fuck you for being a insidious malicious retard. No one should be allowed to dump manufacturing byproducts, normally labeled as toxic waste, into our water supply.
Do you think there was any propaganda used to convince people to vote a certain way?
Silicofluorides, widely used in water fluoridation, are unlicensed medicinal substances, administered to large populations without informed consent or supervision by a qualified medical practitioner. Fluoridation fails the test of reliability and specificity, and, lacking toxicity testing of silicofluorides, constitutes unlawful medical research. It is banned in most of Europe; European Union human rights legislation makes it illegal. Silicofluorides have never been submitted to the U.S. FDA for approval as medicines. The ethical validity of fluoridation policy does not stand up to scrutiny relative to the Nuremberg Code and other codes of medical ethics, including the Council of Europe's Biomedical Convention of 1999. The police power of the State has been used in the United States to override health concerns, with the support of the courts, which have given deference to health authorities.
That was copies pasted from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12749628/
This is point 8 of the nuremburg code: The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code
They put flouride in the water and that is it. There is no degree of skill or care after that. How do they know how many people are using flouridated toothpaste or drinking concetrated forms of flouride or getting other sources of flouride? There is no close observation of the patient to see if there are any side effects or other problems (skeletal fluorosis)ect...
And this from :https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation#Implementation
Sodium fluorosilicate (Na2SiF6) is the sodium salt of fluorosilicic acid. It is a powder or very fine crystal that is easier to ship than fluorosilicic acid. It is also known as sodium silicofluoride.[36]
The issue you're having is your ignoring the chemical reaction that takes place once it's introduced to the body. It ceases to be fluoride once the chemical reaction takes place, it becomes flouroapetite. Which is a mineralized substance. Secondly the test WAS given with the care, the trials were done in areas that did not have naturally occurring fluoride in the water wells. And it is regulated to ensure it is intact. 7 MG per liter. And finally there's no such thing as concentrated fluoride levels in juice. One liter is one liter is one liter and .7 MG etc... it took 2 decades to publish the findings which all began with a noticeable difference in Tooth decay levels from populations that already had naturally occurring fluoride in the water vs. No fluoride. It was carefully done research program done with adherence to the scientific method that underwent peer review. And finally 95% of all toothpaste sold is fluoridated which means it's safe to assume in the regulated water levels won't cause excess fluoride. Toddlers have eaten entire tunes of toothpaste which is 2,000 times more concentrated than water with no fatal effects. Dose makes the poison. Too much fluoride will kill you, yes. So will too much water without fluoride, so will too much oxygen, so will too many apple seeds. You're complete disregard that what is in your body is NOT sodium silicofluoride once the chemical reaction is complete is wilful ignorance on your part.
Why does my toothpaste say not to swallow. Why do fluoride pills say the same. It's toxic. Film yourself eating a bottle of fluoride pills.
And finally there's no such thing as concentrated fluoride levels in juice
If fluoridated water is cooked down, the end result is water with higher concentrations of flouride. Concentrated juice is made with municipal water (which has flouride) cooked down. I know I have called the companies of ocenspray juice and v8 juice.
I am gonna look into flouroapetite, but regardless flouride is added as a medicine and as I posted with sources earlier, it is medically unethical; which was the point I originally made, That you refuted.
As far as flouroapatite being nothing to worry about, where does skeletalflourosis come into play if it is harmless?
It is medically unethical because it cant be regulated. No one knows how much flouridated water one person drinks versus another.
How much of this "medicine" does one person need vs another? A child, an old lady, a large man, people very in their dietary needs.
When fruit juice says concentrated water it is often is cooked down municipal water which has concentrated fluoride levels. Now how much of that concentrated medicinal juice is one drinking vs another.
Fer fuk sakes sodium fluorosilicate is a neuro toxin.
. 7 MG per liter of water. That's the amount. .7 MG to have a base line solidity in any persons to not cause harm while still having a detectable, testable, and verified positive effect. Secondly you are right sodium fluorosilicate is a neurotoxin. Good thing the fluoride in your water and toothpaste forms a compound called flouroapatite which is mineralizing compound that bonds to your enamel on your teeth. So I know big words scary but your misunderstanding of chemistry and siting the wrong compound doesn't help your argument.
Still waiting on you to cite your source for that Nuremberg BS you said. Stop echoing talking points you can't back up.
(post is archived)