It's cute you think voting works?
Did the majority vote for the 1965 immigration act? Did we vote for the war on drugs? Did we vote to go to Iraq and Afghanistan based in the 9/11 attacks!
Did we vote pedo joe biden and the hoe into office?
Your funny
Nice way to dodge the questions. Incredulity alert. Maybe actually read the process involved in fluoridated water, how it was decided when and where, and the final findings of the data after decades long research. Again site your claim or your claim is dismissed.
You're examples are a red herring fallacy, I didn't ask about that, I pointed out that it was voted on. That can't be disputed, and less than 10% was against it in the initial trials and dozens of these morons started calling in with "issues caused by the flouride" BEFORE it was even introduced.
And then how do we make decisions on public health? Only from sources you like?
Why do you insist on medicating water, why fluoride out of all possibilities. Why not lithium, vitamins, calcium. Why is it so important to you that you ingest fluoride. Cause it helps muh teeth science says so. Science is bought and corrupted like every other god damn institution.
You're own incredulity and inability to research anything that doesn't conform to your interpretation of reality. But if you did 2 minutes of searching it is because flouride was a naturally occurring element in some areas groundwater. It's just there. No "they" adding it. And there was trend that was noticed that people from these ares showed significantly less Tooth decay vs areas with out it. So there was the observation. Then they tested the water sources to see what's the difference? Flouride. So they tested what flouride does in the body. Chemical reaction to form flouroapetite which is a hard mineralization compound STRONGER than calcium and would bone to tooth enamel. Then came experiment. One city got a regulated amount of flouride. The control: the rest of the areas of the country that didn't have flouride. This went in for 2 decades. Do I really need to explain the scientific method? Did you not pay attention in middle school science?
Just because people didnt know about it or have access yo information about flouride 70 years ago when it was ‘voted’ on doesnt mean we all have to drink the poison. Fuck you for being a insidious malicious retard. No one should be allowed to dump manufacturing byproducts, normally labeled as toxic waste, into our water supply.
To bad it is not toxic and has been demonstrated to have major benefits to Tooth enamel as well as bone strength. You got any sources, peer reviewed studies, anything to back up you assertions?
You claim it's a toxic byproduct and poison. Citation required.
Do you think there was any propaganda used to convince people to vote a certain way?
They showed the data that people, particularly children, who had well water with naturally occurring fluoride had significantly less tooth decay than people who did not have the naturally occurring fluoride in their water supply. That's called the observation portion of the scientific method. Then they formed the hypothesis based on that observation. I wouldn't call that propaganda.
(post is archived)