(((5g))) no harmful
https://mega.nz/folder/Tf4ymBpA#n6qSf6wk4dBpV9X29rNUFg Only a kike makes that claim. I get that's not you, but a quote.
>(((5g))) no harmful
https://mega.nz/folder/Tf4ymBpA#n6qSf6wk4dBpV9X29rNUFg
Only a kike makes that claim. I get that's not you, but a quote.
Yep. Add this one to the list Its a meta-analysis that references some of those earlier studies, but more importantly shows not only that there is cause for 'harm' inherent in 5G EMF's but also step by step itemises exactly where those responsible for setting European and US EMF safety standards -deliberately and purposely, either mis-quote information from those studies, distorts it to down play the findings, or just plain omits the conclusions (Ie Chapter 5 begins pg44 -22 Reviews on EMF Effects, 20 of Which Are Ignored by SCENIHR).
Yep. Add this one to the list [5G Risk](https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:5d694374-b2ae-4e32-8291-9b2aa37fc133)
Its a meta-analysis that references some of those earlier studies, but more importantly shows not only that there is cause for 'harm' inherent in 5G EMF's but also step by step itemises exactly where those responsible for setting European and US EMF safety standards -deliberately and purposely, either mis-quote information from those studies, distorts it to down play the findings, or just plain omits the conclusions (Ie Chapter 5 begins pg44 -22 Reviews on EMF Effects, 20 of Which Are Ignored by SCENIHR).
(post is archived)