Because all the people who would do anything in the US are heavily armed and won't be fucking around with throwing some plastic cups and trash at police.
Protesting by throwing some paper napkins and plastic cups at riot cops vs protesting by shooting are different scenarios and everyone who is willing to do the latter is well aware that if they do it at the wrong time and under the wrong circumstances it will be ineffective and counterproductive.
True
However that "we will do it for real, when it's going to be for real" charade can very well last forever... In the meantime what? Literally nothing, that's what.
Protesting might be useless, but how does it compare with doing nothing at all?
Yeah, it's essentially a game of chicken, though it doesn't mean that whoever flinches first loses necessarily. But that's how it goes when people are actually armed.
It's just like with people who conceal carry on a larger scale: concealed carry folks will tell you that they have to avoid conflict and not get too pissed off in public, not get into fights, blah blah to avoid drawing on someone and escalating (potentially unnecessarily).
I too would prefer that something be done about the ZOG and the rapidly deteriorating situation of things before it gets to the point where it's really bad, but for a lot of reasons I find it unlikely.
It is like a game of cards where each side thinks they have the other side beat but neither side is willing to call out each others' bluffs. Comparatively little has been done by the tyrants because of our potential response. Little has been done by our side because we do not want to risk getting kyled.
This cannot last forever and someone is gonna step it up.
It's harder for MSM narrative pushers to pretend a thing is popular while hundreds of thousands are showing up on the streets to scream and chant how it actually really sucks
If narrative control wasn't important they wouldn't invest billions into it
(post is archived)