TL;DW- There's a debate in the dissident right about plebeian activism vs aristocratic passivism. The Cathedral (media, universities, and un-elected politicians) is a nexus too powerful to defeat. The right is currently weaker and less focused than it has ever been. In the past the right has been more powerful and focused, but activism had few lasting results. Any political victories draw the ire of media, academia, and corporate boards. How can one attack elite academic institutions effectively if they research cancer treatments and educate the children of the elite (both North American and of other continents)? Trolling the Cathedral assumes a non-progressive force can lead it by the nose into fighting itself. The Cathedral puts any internal conflicts aside repeatedly to squash non-progressives every time. Accelerationism is faulty because it assumes the system will simply wither away, while the dying Cathedral will likely be have horrid death throes. It's dying currently, and leftists are grim about their own future, but leftists are also very happy to fight the culture war because the right's dying too. Arguably faster. The aristocratic position is to build alternative institutions, prepare your family, and wait for the Cathedral to finally die.