Yea he didn't even attack scrubs. He just said "hey, they tested 1/36 vaccines and 2 of (large *x*) ingredients and called that a representative sample" (which it clearly is not). He's also right about the other thing - so many vaccines have been/are successful, that people tend to give anything called a "vaccine" carte blanche to do what it will. Which of course speaks to the bigger problem of calling an mRNA drug a "vaccine" or expanding the definition of "vaccine" in general. If generally people believe anything called a vaccine is good, well, calling more and more drugs "vaccines" will lead to people taking more and more drugs they probably shouldn't. It's a combination of wordplay and dishonest marketing, much like the transgender movement suggesting that a man can become a woman. IOW leftist jew bullshit that led to nat. soc. and frankly I'm looking forward to when it happens again. Hopefully the correct side wins this time.