What, no porno? I was expecting porno.
What, no porno? I was expecting porno.
This guy makes the slits of various spacings and shows waveforms of the outcome, and describes the PDF of light. Much more nitty-gritty than other videos covering the double slit experiment.
This guy makes the slits of various spacings and shows waveforms of the outcome, and describes the PDF of light. Much more nitty-gritty than other videos covering the double slit experiment.
It astounds me that I understand how this works, but mainstream scientists can't. At the quantum scale, causality is GENERATIVE, not merely the rearrangement of pre-existing objects.
A particle doesn't "simultaneously go through two slits", rather the photons in question are reflexively cross-coordinated with the OVERALL status of the universe, thereby reflexively generating the wave pattern upon the next collapse.
In fact, a photon doesn't "travel through" anything whatsoever, ever. The emission and detection of a photon is a reflexive, generative process, one whereby the "empty space" implied by the photon's so-called "motion" first appears as generative output of the observation process, rather than as a preexisting medium of travel.
Reflexive cross-coordination holding between localized (quantum) arrangements and the OVERALL SYSTEM (universe) is a requirement were "quantum non locality" exists, since the ENTIRE SYSTERM is implicated in any "non locality" scenario.
Re. diagram @ 15:18, a photon is depicted as an expanding sphere. In "reality", the space around the "expanding sphere" is likewise expanding at rate "C", meaning from the larger perspective, the "expanding sphere" isn't expanding whatsoever relative to the "expanding" space around it.
Only the INVERTED model of "expanding space" scenario serves to provide a COHERENT description of reality, where COHERENT means "sums to zero value". A STATIC Universe with "Contracting" content, per the CTMU's "Conspansive Duality Principle" is the only "Coherent" description possible, per the definition of "coherent".
The inverted model, ie "Conspansion", yields a "Venn Diagramatic" model, equivalent to the standard "expanding space/field" model, but focusing on the attributes of "objects" (operators) rather than their topological containment.
As described already, any attempt to describe "metric containment" (ie, expanding sphere/circle of light) ultimately yields zero motion relative to the cosmic background, meaning any such description is "localized" and not descriptive of "the universe" in general, which can't be other than pure stasis if a coherent model of it exists.
It astounds me that I understand how this works, but mainstream scientists can't. At the quantum scale, causality is GENERATIVE, not merely the rearrangement of pre-existing objects.
A particle doesn't "simultaneously go through two slits", rather the photons in question are reflexively cross-coordinated with the OVERALL status of the universe, thereby reflexively generating the wave pattern upon the next collapse.
In fact, a photon doesn't "travel through" anything whatsoever, ever. The emission and detection of a photon is a reflexive, generative process, one whereby the "empty space" implied by the photon's so-called "motion" first appears as generative output of the observation process, rather than as a preexisting medium of travel.
Reflexive cross-coordination holding between localized (quantum) arrangements and the OVERALL SYSTEM (universe) is a requirement were "quantum non locality" exists, since the ENTIRE SYSTERM is implicated in any "non locality" scenario.
Re. diagram @ 15:18, a photon is depicted as an expanding sphere. In "reality", the space around the "expanding sphere" is likewise expanding at rate "C", meaning from the larger perspective, the "expanding sphere" isn't expanding whatsoever relative to the "expanding" space around it.
Only the INVERTED model of "expanding space" scenario serves to provide a COHERENT description of reality, where COHERENT means "sums to zero value". A STATIC Universe with "Contracting" content, per the CTMU's "Conspansive Duality Principle" is the only "Coherent" description possible, per the definition of "coherent".
The inverted model, ie "Conspansion", yields a "Venn Diagramatic" model, equivalent to the standard "expanding space/field" model, but focusing on the attributes of "objects" (operators) rather than their topological containment.
As described already, any attempt to describe "metric containment" (ie, expanding sphere/circle of light) ultimately yields zero motion relative to the cosmic background, meaning any such description is "localized" and not descriptive of "the universe" in general, which can't be other than pure stasis if a coherent model of it exists.
(post is archived)