But 2nd says shall not be infringed. As long as you are US citizen, your conviction history shouldn't matter? Or founding fathers being criminals themselves denied ability to themlike own weapons because it could end up in revolt?
But 2nd says shall not be infringed. As long as you are US citizen, your conviction history shouldn't matter? Or founding fathers being criminals themselves denied ability to themlike own weapons because it could end up in revolt?
Sorry deleted a long answer. I stated how the law is because you asked. Maybe someone else could answer the merits of pro-con 2nd amendment history or how it infringes on freedoms.
Sorry deleted a long answer. I stated how the law is because you asked. Maybe someone else could answer the merits of pro-con 2nd amendment history or how it infringes on freedoms.
(post is archived)