Yikes ,Wtf
Yikes ,Wtf
Something like this I think is totally wrong and even sinful, on these churches and congregations there should be the concept of people (not race) as in the Old Covenant, where you only marry who was of your people, tribe or with similar appearance, not country\race, for example, a blonde white american man could marry a blonde white french women, but not marry a black american woman even if are from the same country. And this does not mean you have to hate other people, in fact you encourage other people to do the same with their people. This is not based on envy, anger, hatred or competition, it was a peaceful thing. But it should be mandatory, and kick out who don't obey this law.
To see the people Im talking about, go to 13:26 of this video below :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQzcPA6U3bk
I think the modern day concept of "race""country" current being used on the world today is based on egyptian masonic jewish globalism and replaced the correct God's way.
Something like this I think is totally wrong and even sinful, on these churches and congregations there should be the concept of people (not race) as in the Old Covenant, where you only marry who was of your people, tribe or with similar appearance, not country\race, for example, a blonde white american man could marry a blonde white french women, but not marry a black american woman even if are from the same country. And this does not mean you have to hate other people, in fact you encourage other people to do the same with their people. This is not based on envy, anger, hatred or competition, it was a peaceful thing. But it should be mandatory, and kick out who don't obey this law.
To see the people Im talking about, go to 13:26 of this video below :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQzcPA6U3bk
I think the modern day concept of "race"\"country" current being used on the world today is based on egyptian masonic jewish globalism and replaced the correct God's way.
Really looks like some kind of orc.
https://youtu.be/ld2nWfIap2k
Really looks like some kind of orc.
I guess in fairness we don't know how savagely she loves the D.
I guess in fairness we don't know how savagely she loves the D.
The Negro: what is his ethnological status? Is he the progeny of Ham? Is he a descendant of Adam and Eve? Has he a soul? Or is he a beast in God's nomenclature? What is his status as fixed by God in creation? What is his relation to the white race?
https://www.loc.gov/item/15012815/
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/rbc/rbaapc/22200/22200.pdf
Ham, not being the father of the negro, the negro must have come out of the ark with the beasts, and as one, for he was not one of Noah's family that entered it. This is inevitable, and can not be shaken by all the reasonings of men on earth to the contrary. Now, unless it can be shown that, from Noah back to Adam and Eve, that in some way this kinky-headed and black-skinned negro is the progeny of Adam and Eve, and which we know can not be done, then again it follows, indubitably, that the negro is not a human being—not being of Adam's race.
it follows, from this logic of facts, that the negro is a separate and distinct species of the genus homo from Adam and Eve, and being distinct from them, that it unquestionably follows that the negro was created before Adam and Eve. Created before them? Yes. How do we know this? Because the Bible plainly tells us that Adam and Eve were the last beings of God's creation on earth, and being the last, that the negro must have existed before they were created; for he is here now, and not being their offspring, it follows, from this logic of facts, that he was on the earth before them, and if on the earth before Adam, that he is inevitably a beast, and as a beast, entered the ark. Let us recapitulate our points. We have shown that the assumption of the learned world, that Ham is the progenitor of the negro, is a mistake, philanthropically and innocently made, we have no doubt, but nevertheless a mistake, and a very great one. As Ham is not the father of the negro, and no one asserts that either Shem or Japheth is, then the negro belongs to another race of people, and that he came out of the ark, is a demonstrated fact; and not being of Noah's family, who are white, and Adam and Eve being likewise white, therefore, they could not be the progenitors of the negro; and as neither the name or curse did make Ham a negro, or the father of negroes (and this covers the space of time from now back to the flood and to Noah), and no mesalliance ever having taken place from the flood or Noah, back to Adam and Eve, by which the negro can be accounted for, and Adam and Eve being white, that they could never be the father or mother of the kinky-headed, low forehead, flat nose, thick lip and black-skinned negro; and as Adam and Eve were the last beings created by God on earth, therefore, all beasts, cattle, etc., were consequently made before Adam and Eve were created; and the negro being now here on earth, and not Adam's progeny, it follows, beyond all the reasonings of men on earth to controvert, that he was created before Adam, and with the other beasts or cattle, and being created before Adam, that, like all beasts and cattle, they have no souls.
The Negro: what is his ethnological status? Is he the progeny of Ham? Is he a descendant of Adam and Eve? Has he a soul? Or is he a beast in God's nomenclature? What is his status as fixed by God in creation? What is his relation to the white race?
https://www.loc.gov/item/15012815/
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/rbc/rbaapc/22200/22200.pdf
> Ham, not being the father of the negro,
**the negro must have come out of the ark with the beasts**, and as one, for he was not one of Noah's
family that entered it. This is inevitable, and can not be shaken by all the reasonings of men on earth
to the contrary. Now, unless it can be shown that, from Noah back to Adam and Eve, that in some
way this kinky-headed and black-skinned negro is the progeny of Adam and Eve, and which we know
can not be done, then again it follows, indubitably, that **the negro is not a human being**—not being of
Adam's race.
> it follows, from this logic of facts, that the negro
is a separate and distinct species of the genus homo from Adam and Eve, and being distinct from
them, that it unquestionably follows that the negro was created before Adam and Eve. Created before
them? Yes. How do we know this? Because the Bible plainly tells us that Adam and Eve were the last
beings of God's creation on earth, and being the last, that the negro must have existed before they
were created; for he is here now, and not being their offspring, it follows, from this logic of facts,
that he was on the earth before them, and if on the earth before Adam, that he is inevitably a beast,
and as a beast, entered the ark. Let us recapitulate our points. We have shown that the assumption
of the learned world, that Ham is the progenitor of the negro, is a mistake, philanthropically and
innocently made, we have no doubt, but nevertheless a mistake, and a very great one. As **Ham is not
the father of the negro**, and no one asserts that either Shem or Japheth is, then the negro belongs
to another race of people, and that he came out of the ark, is a demonstrated fact; and not being
of Noah's family, who are white, and Adam and Eve being likewise white, therefore, they could not
be the progenitors of the negro; and as neither the name or curse did make Ham a negro, or the
father of negroes (and this covers the space of time from now back to the flood and to Noah), and
no mesalliance ever having taken place from the flood or Noah, back to Adam and Eve, by which the
negro can be accounted for, and Adam and Eve being white, that they could never be the father
or mother of the kinky-headed, low forehead, flat nose, thick lip and black-skinned negro; and as
Adam and Eve were the last beings created by God on earth, therefore, all beasts, cattle, etc., were
consequently made before Adam and Eve were created; and the negro being now here on earth,
and not Adam's progeny, it follows, beyond all the reasonings of men on earth to controvert, that he
was created before Adam, and with the other beasts or cattle, and being created before Adam, that,
**like all beasts and cattle, they have no souls.**
Again you with these links ending in .gov, who is the dumbass to access this ?
Again you with these links ending in .gov, who is the dumbass to access this ?
Now he's a member of the black community?
Now he's a member of the black community?
(post is archived)