WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

That's an upper limit based off numerous things showing that VAERS reports at 1% and then multiplying the current number of deaths listed in VAERS by 100.

The reasoning is actually pretty good and if you look into the evidence for VAERS reporting around 1%. It's pretty good and it'd be stupid to just ignore it.

With all that said 300,000 or 360,000 or whatever it is seems like it's pretty high because I think we would hear more about it.

[–] 1 pt

I think we would hear more about it.

Hmm doubtful

[–] 0 pt

News is so pozzed its laughable.

[–] 0 pt

just like the MSM reporting the literal tidal wave of black on white crime?

[–] 0 pt

Just so you know, over 2.5 million Americans die every year. That's a big pool to use for any propaganda purposes.

Wasn't that how many they claimed would die of covid last year?

[–] 0 pt

This one is a stretch... lol

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

THIS is a stretch? Not the 2020 vote totals? The covid19 death totals? The price of lumber?

THIS number of dead from an experimental mRNA shot is a stretch?

[–] 2 pts

Not the numbers, just how he got there. The Harvard study was from actual vaccines, not experimental gene therapies. Apples and oranges.

[–] 0 pt

The 4 have nothing to do with eachother.

Watch. "My cock is about 18 inches."

"Yeah I doubt it"

"You doubt that? Not that planes blah blah buildings blah muh steels?"

Dont talk like that

[–] 0 pt

Fucking retarded.

Give me the data and the source.

[–] 0 pt

The number of VAERS reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.