lol no you can’t debunk decades of science in 8 minutes.
Without the Sun, there would be no climate. There would be no us.
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun-be-cause-global-warming
Out-right ignoring the Sun is the dumbest shit scientists have ever done. They ignore it because it would destroy their "theories" that fuel their agenda.
“ The Sun can influence the Earth’s climate, but it isn’t responsible for the warming trend we’ve seen over the past few decades. The Sun is a giver of life; it helps keep the planet warm enough for us to survive. We know subtle changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun are responsible for the comings and goings of the ice ages. But the warming we’ve seen over the last few decades is too rapid to be linked to changes in Earth’s orbit, and too large to be caused by solar activity.”
https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/14/is-the-sun-causing-global-warming/
Define warming trend? For the last 100 years the temperature has both dropped and increased. All negligible numbers and all cyclical. Also NASA just recently said the earth has never been greener as it is right now since their collection of the data. When asked why? They said carbon dioxide. Yep plant food. Saying climate change is like saying the weather changes. Ask yourself why the climate experts stopped using the terms deep freeze, new ice age, or global warming? Especially global warming. They dropped that moniker like a hot potato. All evidence refuted those terms. It's cyclical. Climate change is their new word. I invite you to do a deep dive into the Paris Accord mumble jumble. It's a cash grab.
Damming rivers and mass bottling water are also ignored.
OK. How many minutes does it take?
Three to four hours of debate. But that’s already happened many times, and the climate change deniers lose every time.
It takes 4 hours to disprove an 8 minute video? Seems disproportionate. Is there a counter argument video? Hopefully less than 4 hours long.
(post is archived)