WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You know the carbon and methane fall out of the atmosphere over a period of time right? They don't just get tired of the elevation they bond to rarer atmospheric gasses over a pretty long time and they become a denser gas or particle and fall down to the earth methane which they now say us the worse offender is supposed to be on a 6 to 8 year cycle and they claim the shortage of the rarer gas is making methane stay in the upper atmosphere longer. This is why they want you to cut down on red meat, and why they'll say that america is the worst green house gas emitter, the problem seems really fucking simple to me though, just synthesize the chemicals that methane bonds to and release it strategically across the planet in the upper atmosphere. IDGAF if we have a mini ice age, all the niggers will starve or fall ill from D deficiency.

[–] 0 pt

That's part of their models. Carbon doesn't "fall out", but it's absorbed by plants. Methane eventually oxidizes into carbon dioxide and water. Their models are pretty inclusive; but there are definitely some assumptions in there that aren't panning out.

[–] 0 pt

I know this is radical but I don't think it's as radical as introducing a disease for plebs to shorten their lifespan and cut gluttons down.

If climate change is so disastrous for humanity and life on the planet a war on emissions may be justified. M.A.D. prevents the US and china from duking it out along with basically every other developed and developing country, india and pakistan deny they poses them any longer but we know they've got nukes too. So we turn our eyes to south america the mideast and africa. The worst terrain for war and holding territory as an occupier is south america an airborne extermination campaign would be counter productive in the loss of vegetation and decreased energy efficiency. The mid east involves nukes religious zeal and loads of international alliances and power games, it would be a mess of nuclear powers. Africa is under-defended, the population centers are all on plains or at the edges of jungles, lack of competent land management has created desertification and due to western investments africa is entering the developing stage in most places but it will be an arrested development, their lack of intelligence will keep them in this developing nations stage perpetually, and their booming populations will double and quadruple their populations, nigeria is expected to have 1 billion niggers in 30 years it will be another india a disaster by any right but especially for climate change.

I say we solve all of our problems all at once. "Neo Garveyism" my idea in a package boons will swallow thinking one of malcom x's pals came up with it, we pay niggers 100-300k per nappy head to go to apefrica force the last ones back at the end then invade and kill them all. A genocide is easier than a war, just use the airforce and our new railgun tech in concert with a continental food embargo, half their cities would be gone in a year and the other half would be overcrowded and devolving into cannibalism.

We can split the continent up to countries who participate in the war and pledge to aid the conservation effort.

"Bury" about a billion dead africans at the edges of the deserts so as to fertilize soil so we can plant new forests and jungles.

I also support ocean research into responsible expansion of oceanic vegetation and the construction of a gigantic shade cloths floating above sections of endangered reefs.

Ideally we could move on to the mideast too but it would take an uncucked europe, a world mad at israel, an alliance with russia, at least a dozen neutron bombs and an agreement to cut the chinks in on africa and hand them some territory in central asia.

The US military industrial complex aught to just declare me fuhrer, I'd keep them in business better than anybody else.