I don’t know what you’re talking about. I think you’ve misunderstood my comments because you’re not making any sense.
You said the 8 minute video was not long enough to debunk decades of science. I've asked several times what is long enough. You are not making any sense. But I'm not surprised because only a retard quantifies scientific data by length of presentation.
Your question is just silly.
No video is long enough, as I said you need years of peer reviewed studies, not some dumb fucking YouTube video.
The video references years of peer reviewed studies. Your statement that an 8 minute video isn't long enough is retarded. Your counter arguement to OP is that the video isn't long enough. Now you say that no video critical of your global warming dogma is ever long enough. You probably didn't watch the video because you clearly didn't read the linked and referenced studies. Instead, you attack the media, an 8 min video, and the server, youtube. How do you expect anyone to take your counter argument seriously?
(post is archived)