WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 9 pts

Shapiro has a gift for rhetoric. It's the only nice thing I can say about him. Other than that he's an absolute douche bag.

[–] 6 pts

It’s been theorized that jewish mating practices select for verbal intelligence. In jewish culture rabbis who can best teach and interpret religious texts have the most children.

[–] 4 pts

And those theories are laughable and wrong. jews don't have high verbal IQs. jews are just whiny, complaining, bitchy parasites. They aren't smart. Explained here

[–] 6 pts

The last enemy of the Jews are now the most despised villains in history. I think Jews are pretty smart.

Just because you don't like someone, you can still have a realistic view of their qualities or faults.

[–] 3 pts

That makes sense. They certainly aren't selecting for physical prowess.

[–] 5 pts

I disagree. He's never been convincing. He's always subversive. And it's always been painfully obvious. The issue isn't that he's a good speaker, or highly intelligent: the issue is that others (you included I guess) trust to easily. Stop. If you ever go into a situation where you don't immediately assume everyone in the situation is ALL of; - lying - has malicious intent - hates you

You're setting yourself up for failure. When I tell people that they ALL WITHOUT FAIL cry about how I need to be more positive. I would argue that all evil on Earth exists due to people being positive. This is shown with the simple set of lines on "Weak men create hard times -> hard time create strong men -> strong men create easy times -> easy times create weak men".

[–] 3 pts

I know this may shock you but I disagree with your point and stand by mine. Shapiro's rhetoric has convinced many people. Just because it doesn't work on you or me doesn't mean it isn't real.

His technique of argument is effective on most people he debates with. Yes, that's not the toughest crowd to win an argument against but it is still, be definition, effective.

[–] 3 pts

Not shocking at all. I don't think it had anything to do with "his rhetoric" but rather that people are too trusting. You put someone on sodium pentothal and get them to agree with you doesn't mean your rhetoric is high IQ. What do you think abnormally high E women + abnormally low T men + soy + BPA plastics + aluminum in food + jew porn + extremely abnormal oxytocin use/function create? They create a heavily sedated, drugged person.

[–] 1 pt

You're clearly smarter than the average TV viewer. That's his audience, not people with triple digit IQs.

[–] 0 pt

It's not necessarily their fault or tied to IQ though. I explained somewhere at a very basic level how it's forced by way of drugs, nonfood, and chemical / hormonal disruption.

I'm positive that Trump was inserted to fool the world, and he did.

[–] 0 pt

If you ever go into a situation where you don't immediately assume everyone in the situation is ALL of; - lying - has malicious intent - hates you

Civilization is built by high trust. Unless you propose this as an emergency measure, you set yourself up for long-term failure