there are not many white mass shooters there are a lot of (((white))) mass shooters though

Let me fill you in.

We don't hate other races so much as we love our own, and hate the threat that is being posed to our people by them.

Ideally, we would have a world where everyone could be content, no one would have everything they want, but everyone would have enough to be comfortable and satisfied with what they have, and could die with few regrets (if any).

We don't want to fight, we don't want to hurt anyone, we don't even want this whole "race conflict" thing, even in the "cold" sense of it, because all of us know of at least some members from each racial group that are honestly not bad at all (yes, even including jews).

We are dragged into hate against our will, and do everything we can to resist it on the way, same applies to conflict, we aren't talking excitedly about war because we glorify it in our minds, the prospect terrifies us and might mean we would have to do things we would consider morally abhorrent under normal circumstances (like your example of hurting strangers as an instigator of violence).

We are talking excitedly about war because it looks like the only option left to us, and a good chance to break out from the far more frightening alternative of sinking slowly into hell without even the dignity of putting up a good struggle, the horror of war means avoiding the worse horror of no war, but no salvation, either.

Once we fall into that, we will come out different, you see what communism had done to the russians and the chinese, it totally altered their population's genetics, the best part of their people died and was replaced with the worst parts of them, that became more prominent, this is because every political policy has an effect on population genetics, and under communism, all the best parts of people's humanity makes them more likely to die leaving no offspring, while the worst aspects increase reproductive success, and are thus the traits that dominate the population under such a system.

Do you not truly understand the true horror that we are facing here? we are risking the shining part of our people's soul that makes us capable of greatness, that wondrous spark of potential, is under threat of being snuffed out, communism gives entire people's the genetic equivalent of a lobotomy, only in this case the goal is to kill our most noble aspects, the keys to our greatness as a people, and without that, we may as well be extinct, as living on in such a reduced state would be a fate worse than death for our people.

If they were content to live and let live, we would reciprocate that attitude.

if they were content to let us tell the truth, we wouldn't be so offended by their lies.

if we had the option to take any other path than the only one that shows promise to us at this point, we gladly would prefer that one to this one that is now being considered.

even if they were against us, but had not the power to pose a significant danger to us, we would still be content.

They are a clear and active threat to us, and right now they have so much power, that it is impossible to get them to even care to listen to us, when they have the power to just do as they please, why would they, when they have nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose by doing so?

People are driven by two things, that which they desire, which attracts them, and that which they fear, which repels them, people only avoid pursuing a desire when there is a greater fear causing them to do so, and they only confront a fear when there is a greater desire pushing them to do so. There is no such thing ass a truly selfless act, the very fact that people have reasons for doing what they do makes this an impossibility.

The only way to get someone to do anything is to make them think it's a good idea for them to do it, the only way to get someone to not do something is to make them think it's a bad idea, people operate on carrots and sticks, they generally do not divert their path unless they must circumvent something they wish to avoid on their road, or they sight something they want to pursue off of it.

We have little in the way of carrots or sticks right now, there is nothing we can offer that they desire or fear, except that they desire our hard-earned money, and they fear our capacity for violence against them, the former is localized to our current situation, where they need us to keep things running, but, as Heinlein so well put it, the second is the eternal component in all relationships between people; call it violence, aggression, or force, the idea of "do as I say, or I will do something to you that you find unpleasant" underlies most of human interactions since the dawn of civilization and a good deal before it.

So we have these two options, but a limited capacity to act on either of them, in both cases, due to the fact that a coordinated effort would be needed in each case, and we are scattered, isolated, and fearful of each other being impostors (which destroys the trust needed for organization), we would need to plan things where our enemy cannot see what we intend to do, and that means meeting up in real life and talking to each other offline, which the combination of manipulative shills and the lockdown handily makes into a difficult proposition.

The first option is to quit supporting the system, a general boycott of our whole society, the infamous idea of the "White Strike", but such a boycott is difficult to pull off, so many of us are resistant to even reduce their contribution to society, let alone making significant cuts to it, they find fulfillment in their employment, they have families to support, they have no knowledge of what to by or refrain from buying, etc.

Such ideas of even CONSIDERING what it would mean for someone to withdraw even a little from propping up this corrupt establishment in order to put economic pressure on others for the purpose of giving us some political leverage to negotiate with, has proven time and again nigh impossible to organize, it's a sign of how deep the decline of our people has rotted itself in us that one response we continually get on sites like these, is that the users of this place don't want to sacrifice any bit of the comfort that they have in their current lives for the sake of a cause they claim to believe in, they go "well, you will collapse out society, and then everything will be shitty for us" as if it would be a surprise to me.

So our second option presents itself, and un like the first, which requires mass action to even become noticeable, let alone effective, there is an option that not only is easier for people in our situation to pull off by our lonesome, but which we have seen employed to great effect in very recent times, we know the power that this path holds, and all t takes is individuals sacrificing themselves, which is easier than trying to get a whole group of people to make sacrifices for the sake of the cause.

It's something that we can do by ourselves, that is guaranteed to make a difference, if enough of us do it, they will begin to fear us, not pretend to fear us as an excuse for going after us, as is the current state of affairs, but actually fear us, the way they fear angry jews, muslims, blacks, and hispanics.

They would cease to call us violent or talk about us in a negative light, if it were to pass that they expected a price to be paid by someone for such words, they would cease to do thing that displease us when they are terrified of the consequences of their actions, which takes the form of our retaliation, we live in an age where we can see the power this kind of solution holds.

I myself had noticed it a long time ago, back in high school, I was the creepy quiet kid that got picked on to reinforce the pecking order, then the columbine shooting happened, and the commonly accepted narrative as that the shooters were victims of bullying and the shooting was their retaliation when other measures had failed and the conditions became intolerable for them, I found immediately after the news of what happened that everyone was nicer to me, they feared me, and so they respected me, because they thought I was capable of becoming a threat to them and to others, the bullying that I experienced stopped immediately, and I got apologies for previous mistreatment.

No good comes without sacrifice, everything has a cost that is proportional to the perceived value of what has been gained from the exchange, this is the second rule of thermodynamics and the first rule of alchemy (made famous by anime, but existing since long before the days of Newton), equivalent exchange.

Machiavelli talked well on the subject of fear, his favorite form of rule was a democratic republic, not because he thought it represented freedom or governance by the people (as most enlightenment era philosophers had thought), but because he felt that it would become the most stable form of tyranny over the people, because one representative could maintain power through using the other one as a means of ruling through fear, he predicted that these would be public opponents who differed on trivial matters, but kept the same essence in common and worked together to share power over the people behind the scenes.

Here is how our relationship with non-whites formed:

• we encountered them and made the initial assumption that their minds worked as ours did, we assumed it was only mere circumstance that separated our fates, we were dead wrong.

• they could not function among us at the same level that we could, and they were distinct from us, so that the differences between the groups were obvious, and we leaned the hard way that this would result in conflict between us when they noticed that they had less than us, and the only answer we could offer was that we had wronged them in such a manner as to produce this result.

• the reality of racial differences was a means of putting down these flames of hatred, they offered an alternative explanation to the idea that the disparities were caused by malice (intended or not) on our part.

• So, of course, this was stripped away as an option by the jews, who called this well-founded theory that killed hatred between the races "hateful pseudoscience" and called their pseudoscientific "racism of the gaps" which propagated increasingly levels of hate towards us "anti-hate science"; despite how it places the fault of all the problems of the world on one race, and proclaiming that the destruction of this race was the panacea solution to all the issues anyone else could possibly be dealing with.

• Almost everyone, including most of our own people, were duped into accepting this clearly preposterous claim on little basis except the desire to be good people who distance themselves from their ancestors, who the jews told them were the ultimate incarnation of human evil on this planet, in a very successful campaign of shame and guilt and self-hatred, which are based entirely on a mixture of spoken lies and unspoken truths that when corrected reveals a history that tells the exact opposite story of our race and it's comparison to the others we share our planet with.

• all hope of communication, let alone negotiation, have broken down, and we have seemingly lost all our bargaining chips except the ones we are least willing to play with.

• On the backs of this, they amassed more and more power, this in addition to their conquest of our economic systems, and those of other countries across the globe, they rule the rulers that nominally hold power over us by our consent, the jews now have all the systems in their back pockets, so the separation of powers is rendered null and void, since there is no longer anyone to hold anyone in power to account, worst of all, the path into the realm of political influence was getting more and more closed off to us, to the point that now we have no hope at all of acquiring it by the means our nation depended on us to take it.

• Except one, which one country's founders had ensured would remain available to them at all times, which is commonly understood as "politics by other means" and that is when the people use force to remove their government and install one that better represents their will. the problems with this is that usually the idea is that this would be done by a militia formed of the people in some pub or tavern, which, as stated above, is not an option for various reasons, the second problem is that the people's understanding of this concept is very weak, and so the elites have been given power over successive generations to further and further legislate this option away from us, the anxiety fueling this rhetoric is that one day, we will not even have the option of an armed rebellion.

It's not just them taking guns, its them taking freedoms, and them taking people, the government has turned against those who have become malcontents, and there are a very sizable population already of those who are so displeased with their rulers, that the prospect of taking them out of power by force is more appealing than any other options they are aware of.

One big thing stopping them is the fact that people who are almost like us have been throwing themselves behind the police, who are the front line enforcers of the establishment they with would be overthrown, could you imagine being a part of some army where the majority of the soldiers were willing to fight the enemy leaders, but could not bring themselves to harm one of the enemy soldiers standing in their way? the enemy soldiers, on the other hand, demonstrate eagerness to take out your soldiers.

So if you want to shoot down any idea that is peaceful or abides by the law, and you do not present an alternative that is also peaceful or law-abiding, know that you are also effectively advocating for the ultimate response to be undertaken in it's place.

This is desperation, when cornered, the rat bites all those who approach.

Lastly, trying to dissuade us with attempts to make us feel compassion for members of the groups that are hurting us, is not going to work, we've been burned out of such things, overloaded, it sounds all too familiar to us, and was a source of suffering for us for a long time, we've lost the capacity for it, and have no interest in rekindling that aspect of our cognition again.

Words and rhetoric destroyed the US and the west. Words and rhetoric will save us. I know there's a lot of people on here who would find this to be cuckery, but I don't care.

If words and rhetoric alone win over few people, great. The reality, however, is that a narrative forged in anti-Whiteness is to prepare the world for a hastened genocide of Whites in the United States is grasping a wider audience. It is the path of Rhodesia and South Africa that is being walked. I feel that words and rhetoric of countering this narrative mean nothing without a strong, centralized, united deterrent of Whites to dissuade the opposition from perusing this path. Our existence should not be a question or in doubt, if that requires arms, so be it. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Ideally, our existence should be secured with a nation of our own people. Only then, can we have self-determination and co-existance.

Will our opposition want to listen to this message? Probably not. If there was peaceful or even a bloodless option presented, that opportunity is waning because a meme known as anti-Whiteness is still feverously festering and being fostered in the population. Mainstream commercial markets push the anti-White narrative and other narrative damaging to White and Western civilization regardless of impact or backlash. Athletes are telling the populace that a White system is currently hunting down and killing blacks. The media promote anti-Whiteness as virtuous and synonymic of heroism. The sitting US president denounces his own nation White and Western values created as racist. Preservation attempts of Whites preserving their culture or heritage is dismissed as supremacy even if it doesn't intrude unto other races. Monuments representing White history and accomplishment are being desecrated and erased. Violence and anger is openly displayed against Whites, especially against those that can not defend themselves. Even targeted hatred and violence against Asians by blacks is then construed and cast as White supremacy. This is all deliberate and by design, and no voice in the mainstream is speaking for us, because the jews that control the mainstream has snuffed them out and silenced them by cancelling them.

The words and rhetoric the opposition currently wants to hear is "death to white people" or the current softer message "Some white people may have to die for Black communities to be made whole in this struggle to advance for freedom. To pretend that's not the case is ahistorical and dangerously naïve". I believe they have made up their mind and galvanized their frame for questions they want Whites to answer to. They don't want to change that, and I will not bargain against my people's existence by any measure. We are at an impasse were Whites relenting means total erasure.

Overall, I agree with the message that lone wolf White actors is not an answer. It is wasteful, undirected, and pointless. I prescribe to nation building, not guerilla-terror against the citizens.

This guy seems to think government, justice, and LEOs work.

Denouncing gets us nowhere. I agree mass shootings aren’t a well thought out plan of action, but they are action. They are real and regardless of consequences afterwards are real and measurable.

Words and rhetoric can work just fine, but not if they’re disconnected from actual shifts of power.

They are a product of liberal brainwash. Did everyone already forget about the New Mexico compound that was discovered, bulldozed, and promptly memory holed?