I didn’t say anything about species but lets get that canard out of the way first shall we? Species is an arbitrary definition. The entire Linnaean taxonomic nomenclature system is a social construct. The decision to classify two organisms in as the same or separate subspecies or species or genus is an arbitrary decision as there is no precise definition for any of these and organisms from even different genuses have produced reproductively viable offspring. Its a preference whether or not blacks and whites are catergorized as separate species or subspecies which has zero to do with the biological FACTS of how related blacks and whites are and when that divergence took place and what the practical implications of that divergence are. And please don’t bring that FST statistic at me unless you actually understand what it is saying. What I mean to say is, only a retarded faggot would dick around over the terminology. I made no assertion about terminology and it has no biological relevance. Fossils of early or extinct Homos like Erectus or Denisovan or Neanderthal are found throughout Eurasia prior to a more recent OOA event specifically pertaining to Homo Sapiens. The OOA migrations of these archaic Homos may have happened at least 2 million years ago and probably in multiple waves. These early homonins diverged from chimpanzees and australopiths 4 or 5 million years ago so its a fairly safe bet they all originated in africa since we see the most diversity and presence of all three in africa. Common ancestry of all living homos is put at around 150 to 300 thousand years ago in Africa. That is a most recent common ancestor. It does not account for all human genetics which would include an earliest common ancestor which some put a 4.5 million years ago. To put it in to retard speak, “OOA” theory allows for the potential that human genetics began to diverge 4.5 million years ago and that some ancestry of some modern groups is from homos that were living and evolving in Asia for at least 2 million years. There are many different OOA models that disagree on things like rate of genetic mutation, date the ancestors of eurasians physically left africa the date eurasians diverged from west african/bantu/east african ancestors, and what portion of african ancestry is due to back migration to africa (hint: alot). No one in mainstream evolutionary anthropology is rejecting the idea that a significant component of human evolution has been occuring outside africa for millions of years. No one. No one that I know of is denying that large scale back migrations from eurasia impacted modern africans over the last 20,000 years at least. And no one is denying significant introgression from multiple non-homo sapiens in to every major genetic population. But so far as I know all existing mtDNA and Y-chromosomal haplogroups can be traced to a genetic eve and adam who probably live in africa about 150 to 300 thousand years ago. That does not mean all of our ancestry is from that population. It means that other mtDNA and Y chromosomal groups were lost in the populations due to genetic drift, although the autosomal DNA from archaic homos may account for as much as 20% in some individuals. Australian abos have introgression from denisovans, maybe 5 or 10 % but all of their mtDNA haplogroups are traced to M and N macrogroups AFAIK. If you know different, serve it up faggot. Cite. Im happy to throw down with you on this subject because as you can see, Ive done some research on it. I have my own personal favored model of OOA and Im sure there is room for revision on it as additional genetic and archeological discoveries are made. Chinks and Dot-heads are doing a lot of this research and have no consideration for the sensitivities of PC anthropology profs in the US and Europe. The mathematical certainties of the human genome have smashed liberal fairy stories. You better bring your A game because I can destroy most people on this subject. Human evolution is diffuse and I doubt you have a good understanding of what the points of contention are in this field. Be my guest though