Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Some cool pictures, just sharing.

Some cool pictures, just sharing.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

They didn't have batteries for the hassle blades to survive the extreme temperatures that they told us existence space.

The reason why it's hard to convince the moon landings are not real because as a kid they were told they were real.

Just like when you're a kid and they tell you if you die you'll get virgins in heaven.

Is this fucking Reddit now why the fuck are we having to wait to make post this stupid fucking admins

[–] • 0 pt

It's a test to see who is capable of critical thinking and who accidentally bred it out and is now trying to get everyone to do the same.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Hooning around in a buggy for no reason other than to do donuts and show off ( look we got us a car on the moon) was a red flag for me. I never believed for a minute they actually went there after seeing that footage.

[–] • 2 pts

I’m of the opinion that we went, never left, we still go, and are gonna go again publicly. The media spectacle of the event was the fraud. Why did it happen this way? Because after whatever crashed in Roswell in 1947, the military and fed gov got so spooked by what they learned from it that going to the moon was the ONLY logical next choice. How could they accomplish this? Have to sell the idea to the American people so they will accept their tax dollars being spent on this endeavor. But they couldnt possibly sell the public using the truth as they needed to keep that classified so our enemies do not learn our motives. It was disguised as a space race and sold as a fight against Russian supremacy, when in reality Russia just wanted to find out what’s going on up there as well.

When all was said and done and the mission was ready, they sent it up quietly to learn whatever they could. What they learned could also not be revealed to the public at the time. Now they had the problem of having taken all the taxpayers money, and something they couldnt show for it. Thus the movie production. Americans win the space race, we get footage of bouncing astronauts, and a burgeoning space program so American wins and everyone is happy. Reality is NASA isnt a space program as much it is a taxpayer theft bureaucracy, and all the cool space stuff goes on in secret. And whatever is happening on the moon has to do with the 1947 UFO incident and the UFOs of today that the US military is beginning to reveal.

[–] • 2 pts

Why did it happen this way? Because after whatever crashed in Roswell in 1947, the military and fed gov got so spooked by what they learned from it that going to the moon was the ONLY logical next choice.

It was because Kennedy shot his mouth off in public and by the time he got his head shot off it was too big to wind down and cancel. They needed a result, so they filmed one.

[–] • 1 pt

Makes you wonder what's on the dark side of the moon.

[–] • 1 pt

Something tells me we are going to get a peek very soon. Musk is supposed to be sending up a Japanese billionaire to slingshot around and come back soon. Perhaps there will be a livestream of the event.

[–] • 1 pt

No fucking way with 1969 technology did they go to the moon 6 times in 6 years just no fucking way

[–] • 2 pts

No fucking way with 1969 technology straight white men, including retired Nazis did they go to the moon 6 times in 6 years just no fucking way

With respect, goat, FTFY.

[–] • 0 pt

This. Faggots are caught up in a demoralization campaign because they have a shiny new iPhone

[–] • 1 pt

This is the strongest counter argument to this one I've found, and in light of the flaws we sometimes catch in today's deepfakes, I find it a compelling line of argument.

And the deepfakes today are usually creepy good, when they aren't green screening Biden's hands in front of the press mics. And that's the classified technology, not your civvy-tier-tech, spank-bank-stash of AOC sucking dick. The idea that they had better in the 60s is magical thinking on a tranny PMS level.

I'd be super interested in hearing counterarguments from anybody with the AV chops to engage this from a technical angle.

https://youtu.be/_loUDS4c3Cs

[–] • 3 pts

This is the strongest counter argument to this one I've found, and in light of the flaws we sometimes catch in today's deepfakes, I find it a compelling line of argument.

And the deepfakes today are usually creepy good, when they aren't green screening Biden's hands in front of the press mics. And that's the classified technology, not your civvy-tier-tech, spank-bank-stash of AOC sucking dick. The idea that they had better in the 60s is magical thinking on a tranny PMS level.

AI generated CG is still in it's infancy and still glitches a lot, this does not prove that physical effects techniques (which were mature in the 1960s) could not produce a believable result.

I'd be super interested in hearing counterarguments from anybody with the AV chops to engage this from a technical angle.

I've seen that video, it's a retarded strawman. He's saying that because there wasn't commercially available equipment back then to fake the moonlanding videos using digital video playback that it must have been live and they couldn't possible have pulled off a fake all in one take like that.

  • They could easily have prerecorded it on high quality film, then transmitted a projection. This was common practice in studios at the time.

  • The footage is low quality enough that we have no idea if it was a single take. There's enough noise and glitches that it could easily have been splicted together from multiple takes.

[–] • 1 pt

ITT: "White people and nazis are too stupid to launch a tin can. Only with the help of Africa will America be able to get to the most nearby space rock "

[–] • 1 pt

The FIRST trip that allegedly landed on the moon :

1> Has almost no distributed photographs, vs the countless photos from all subsequent flights. Strange.

2> Somehow lost all video tape of all hours on moon beamed back to the world. recently a one quarter resolution copy was found in australia storage. No footage of all subsequent flights were lost. Strange.

the first landing just has so many anomalies vs the subsequent flights

[–] • 1 pt

Has almost no distributed photographs, vs the countless photos from all subsequent flights. Strange.

They have a few, and they'll still send copies if you ask, but they claim they lost the negatives of all the others.

[–] • 0 pt

Flat earth crew

4.0 HS gpa 36 math/english ACT Top 5 engineering Uni deans list 3.5 gpa

I'm not retarded! Hehe

[–] • 0 pt

There was so much that could go wrong on that mission. It's hard to believe with the tech at the time that they could so it so many times in a row without a complete disaster happening.

[–] • 0 pt

Airplanes are fake.