"I have a healthy distrust those who are different, I don't want them around simply because they are different and disruptive." vs "I hate niggers for no reason." These are saying the same thing from a different perspective. The first is my perspective, seeing it as healthy and virtuous. The 2nd is the jewish perspective trying to pathologize it. Of course kikes are only going to pathologize it for whites. But both really don't have a different meaning. It's like calling a riot a protest and a protest and insurrection. The important thing is not what you say it's how you say it. You can talk about how niggers are criminal and stupid, you can talk about how jews are evil and malicious even to the most liberal normie, you just have to choose your words correctly. As you noticed they recoil at slurs and language they deem mean or hateful. If you talk about it from a perspective of fake compassion they'll side with you. For example: It's really unfortunate that blacks have such high rates of fatherlessness. This has been repeatedly correlated with criminality and violence. It would be great if we went back to the 50s where blacks had high rates of marriage, this led directly to less crime. However it's the nature of their culture to be fatherless, it's just as common throughout Africa as it is here. The 50s were and aberration and them having intact families was essentially forced at the barrel of a gun. Liberals could not accept this. Liberals are opposed to forcing people to be better for their own sake and the sake of society. Their religion is total freedom, even if that freedom means everyone's life is destroyed.