Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

They keep calling these things coffins but then, the boxes never have a body. Who spends that much care making a coffin and then not use it? https://youtu.be/d8Ejf5etV5U

[–] • 1 pt

Good point.

[–] • 0 pt

Also, if it was for a ruler or some high level person wouldn't they use the same technology to engrave the name into the stone? Wouldn't every stone box be similarly engraved? So on the few that have inscriptions why switch to crude chisels and crude lettering? So, yeh, I'm not buying the coffin theory.

So what were the boxes for? Religion? Why buries their religion that deep underground? It's like you are going to tell your people you've made dozens of high tech stone boxes and hidden them underground for shits and giggles. Now bow down and worship. Nope, that doesn't work either.

I'm thinking we're not getting a complete picture because the technology has been taken away for metals or material.

Think of it like this: You drop a aircraft into the jungle that's loaded with primitive spear throwers. They start stripping it for bits of metal until all that's left is the frame.

Later explorers who are just a bit more advanced some and ponder over the bits left and try to figure out what this strange sculpture means. Oh, obviously it's an object of worship.

[–] • 0 pt

This is dated 5 billion years ago Everything is dated based solely on hieroglyphics scratched into them by hand that look like they're done last week.

Smoking gun for that shit being fake. 5 mins in and I stopped watching because I'm not a retard.

[–] • 0 pt

> This is dated 5 billion years ago Everything is dated based solely on hieroglyphics scratched into them by hand that look like they're done last week. Not once in the entire video does she say anything is dated from 5 bya. Not sure where you got that idea. Regarding the Egyptologist's dating method, this is correct. They've built up a fanciful historical timeline based on speculation and rough translations of the graffitiglyphs found scratched into the monuments. Carbon-14 dating is used when there is organic material buried with or near the artifacts of question, but they can't be sure if the original builders of the monuments left the organic remains there or if a later civilization came along left their stuff laying there where they found the monuments. A lot of IFs and MAYBEs involved in dating ancient megalithic sites.
> Smoking gun for that shit being fake. 5 mins in and I stopped watching because I'm not a retard. I'm not sure what you're calling fake. But I assure you, nothing about ancient megalithic/monolithic architecture is fake. Check out this YT creator, his channel is called UnchartedX and he makes the best documentaries on the internet on the topic of ancient civilizations and the undeniable evidence that the builders of the ancient megaliths were once in possession of some sort of advanced high technology and powerful machining tools; every tool leaves a signature, especially in hard stone. And there are signatures all over the Old Kingdom megaliths in Egypt. Heres a link to the UnchartedX website and YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/UnchartedX/videos?view=0&sort=p&flow=grid https://www.unchartedx.com/