I heard today a previous arrest would be admissable evidence during the trial. I wasn't listening that closely because it's just clown world BS but I'm pretty sure that's what I heard.
I heard today a previous arrest would be admissable evidence during the trial. I wasn't listening that closely because it's just clown world BS but I'm pretty sure that's what I heard.
They said last week that this evidence wasn't going to be admitted, because reasons
this whole trial is a set up, the jurors are all 20-30, not a single boomer so far
>
They said last week that this evidence wasn't going to be admitted, because reasons
this whole trial is a set up, the jurors are all 20-30, not a single boomer so far
I read somewhere that snippets may be allowed from previous arrests I'm not so sure what they show will be anything like this.
I read somewhere that snippets may be allowed from previous arrests I'm not so sure what they show will be anything like this.
It's pretty damn kikey that you can't exhibit whatever you deem fit.
It's pretty damn kikey that you can't exhibit whatever you deem fit.
Isn't it though
Isn't it though
(post is archived)