It’s insane how he’s insane yet not. This guy was in deep.
Wasn't insane, was a CIA project. Entire Manson Family murders were a setup. 'Chaos' by Tom O'Neill lays out documented evidence.
Ain't it weird that most every serial killer has ties to Democrats. Like how Rodney Alcala studied film under Roman Polanski and was put back on the streets by Diane Feinstein?
Ain't it weird that most every serial killer has ties to Democrats.
Charles Manson wasn't a serial killer. As far as anyone knows, he never killed anyone.
Well now instead of framing them for murder they just pant CP on a computer
And Roman Polanski's pregnant wife Sharon Tate was used in the hit piece.
has ties to Democrats.
Here we go again. Seriously, go kill yourself.
The Unibomber Manifesto got good reviews from serious readers at the time, and it aged very very well.
It found him out. Ted Kaczynski's brother sold him out for cash. The story goes when the FBI brought in David Kaczynski and his wife the first thing out of his mouth was "let's talk about the money". The FBI paid that bastard millions and not just the $1 million reward money. Rense talked about it years ago and what supposedly happened was David's lawyer contacted the FBI (they hired a criminal defense lawyer...why?) and negotiations happened back and forth for the money. The sit down meeting was to hand over the info on Ted and hammer out the tax implications.
Thanks. I can see turning in a family member for the good of society, but selling is creepy. What exactly was Ted's motivation? Was it simply to get published?
David Kaczynski = the Unasquealer
They should have published it. It's better than the drivel that normally occupies their pages, such as: which princess is a bitch this week and where are Donald Trump's tax returns.
It was published in newspapers at the time, as it was a demand if his while he qas a fugitive, and is available on the net.
Another fake.....
Nah uncle ted was legit, and he was right about everything.
Some of the things he is saying here are deeply profound, and betray a really penetrating understanding of psychology, and other things. He has that mystic's way of speaking about them, though, which will turn off many of the pseudo-intellectual types, those who listen to actual intellectuals, understanding perhaps half of what they hear, but who then come to equate genius with a certain manner of speaking and dress. So many today would toss aside what Manson is saying here as the specious rambling of a crazy man. Not at all.
I am not saying Manson qualifies in this regard, I simply don't know enough about him, but I think some people know things so large that they can't put them into words - namely because what they know is so integrating, and unifying and big-picture, while the academic function and intellectual trend of our university system (really, the whole scientific project) is to explode categories and domains, as opposed to unify. That's why big picture reasoning usually gets labeled under conspiracy theories, and rarely makes it except only in the most theoretical of sciences and in the most cookie-cutter and irrelevant applications.
(post is archived)