it comes down to if you tube alternatives exist and they dont for a consumer standpoint and youtube is interfering with the users transmission of video youtube says they still own(i read the TOS, gogle highlights this point when you search) so by that virtue i thought they had to be fair while offering a service all others pale to.
rosanne cited a courtdoc once about a sidewalk owned by a private copany but no other passageways existed..
getting people rallied is a good thing so i wouldnt be quick to call thier group futile.
That is a completely meaningless string of words. Try to think about it with these tools:
1) Do you believe in private property?
2) If yes, do you believe you should be able to do ANYTHING with your private property? Including discriminate on who gets to use your property and how?
You EITHER believe in private property, meaning that you own your home and I cannot come and take it from you. OR you believe there is no such thing as private property in which case I GET TO COME AND TAKE YOUR PROPERTY FROM YOU.
Youtube is private property. They built it. They let you put your content up for consignment and they pay you. No one else is doing it. They get to do whatever the hell they want with their property including kick you off for any reason they choose.
If they don't have that right, then you don't have a right to own a house. And I can move my chickens and pigs into that spare room that you have because, hey, no property rights means that we all get to share.
Right?
//EDIT: We got to the point I wanted to make quicker than I thought. My comment about Germans wasn't exactly what you said it was. What it was about was PRECISELY the point here: Germans (and you) are communists. By definition, you believe in the greatest evil of all: we are all the same, no one has the right to private property, you get to take my property at any time that you want.
The point of my original post, and i knew you would get to it your self, is that you don't realize that you are making the evil argument: communism is good and we should share.
No.
We should respect each other, love each other and protect each other. That is ONLY possible if at the root of your belief system is the respect for private property. The moment you believe in private property is the moment that you can very clearly and easily reason about these issues without breaking a sweat.
1 yeah private propery exists. and you just said nothing i said made any sort of sence.
2you tube says.. You retain ownership rights in your Content. However, we do require you to grant certain rights to YouTube and other users of the Service, as described below.
and youtube is what All parents use to put lull their kids via internet video. the 2nd place 'youtube' opoerates at a much lower capacity so they shouldnt as a company be meddling with politics for example.
if they were dailymoition it would be ok for them to shill for the democrats but being so big that would be, i heard being a Fourum as they are indeed, illegal.
i dont know law that well but i heard how fourms that are so massive they must be used if at all cant unfairly censor/obstruct what otherwise would be idk"constitutional".
their shareholders have nothing to do with politicaly motivated movements and if it did id imagine some form needs to be filled for that.
nice talk.. ill stop responding now.
e, sorry im writing so terribly for you
No problem. The following is clear:
1) English may not be your first language or your iq is a bit lower than what you are striving for. I don't care too much for spelling or grammar, that takes practice.
2) You don't know what you are talking about.
3) You are just repeating arguments you have read from around the internet. This is okay, we all start from somewhere. You need a bit more time to pull everything together into a coherent structure.
This also takes time and practice.
If you want to test out your thoughts and ideas, feel free to message me.
(post is archived)