Who funds this site? I'm a little impressed by the site's layout, it does look like a knockoff of YouTube, which makes it far more functional than BitChute and Rumble, both of which have search engines and interfaces so terrible that even in the 1990s they would have been cited as an example of bad web design. While the video does appear to be showing fake mace and tear gas, there was indeed real mace and tear gas used. Either that, or they had some good makeup artists on hand to swell up the eyes of many people, and some good actors to sell the performance. The video references "professional photographers conveniently on the scene". This seems weak as it does not prove that these people were paid to be there as part of a plot. There are scads of "independent journalists"--all it takes is a camera and an internet stream--and any of them would've been fools to have not been on hand for such a yuge event. The glass in the door being plasticized for shatter resistance doesn't seem like an issue to me unless it is proven that this exact door normally had regular glass in it. There's a LOT of circumstantial evidence in this that can either be what the narrator says, or it could be explained in a way that supports the mainstream narrative. I have doubt in this case as normally these Sandy Hoax incidents only use crisis actors. Now, perhaps Las Vegas was the start of using normies, but the Trump Capitol March had, at its peak, hundreds of thousands of people. That's a whole lot of Trump-loving normies who could've thrown a wrench into the works of a hoax. In fact, we know that many of the Trump-loving normies did throw a wrench into the hoax-works because the agents in the crowd who encouraged the crowd to become violent and destructive had their incitement fall on deaf ears.