it's all an accident, not genocide
To me this is a philosophical question: is it even possible to contaminate a poison meant to kill someone? Did Moderna do something to now make them a target?
They are probably upset that some batches weren't as "effective" in obtaining the desired results.
This can also be used to gaslight people into thinking that there were just a few "bad" batches, when the reality was that they were all toxic, just that some were more acutely toxic than others. The manufacturing process (process 2) guaranteed that, including the presence of DNA fragments and SV40.
At this stage, it would be safe to assume that all actions of those involved are to obfuscate or shift blame for their complicity.
Legal shielding imho.
It would be interesting to see defense attorneys make that argument in court. 🤡 World.
Technically if you're looking for a specific result in your poison, then it can become contaminated. Not all poisons are the same.
Oh, I see: by introducing contaminates, it may not have been as effective at killing people.
Sadly this is the only article I can find now, but there was a more detailed one where Cintas senior management called a meeting with Merck senior management to get the problem under control. The Cintas folks that had to pick up the uniforms from Merck were traumatized. Merck was a subcontractor or supplier for the vax at the time.
That will teach Moderna they need to pay more bribes to bureaucrats, and not just politicians.
(post is archived)