Knowing that the COVID jab was not safe required zero additional information. The experimental treatment was rolled out in a massively accelerated timeline, meaning that there was no possibility of the amount of time required for safety testing to be completed. Therefore, the claim that it was "safe" was a proven lie. That does not imply that the unjabbed knew that it was dangerous, but there is a distinct difference between safe, unsafe and dangerous. Effectively no medical intervention is actually safe, they all entail risks, whether through dose dependent effects, or specific physiological reactions for specific groups of people (genetic differences). The question then becomes, how unsafe is the treatment. Using testing on a significantly large number of patient, you can determine how unsafe a medical treatment is. If the risk of harm from the treatment exceeds the likely harm from what it is treating, that would lead to the treatment being determined to be dangerous (more harm than good).
Given that a false claim of safety was made, the unequivocal claims of effectiveness are immediately suspect and an adverse inference is merited. Even a cursory look into the effectiveness research and data soon shows that the effectiveness was massively overstated. Primarily, this was done through a statistical trick (one that could only have been deliberately employed, given that the people doing the research are supposed to be experts on these issues). That trick was to classify people who received the treatment as untreated for an initial period (usually 2 or 3 weeks). This caused incidences of disease to be misattributed to the untreated group for that period, which even if the treatment was an inert placebo would lead to an apparent 85-95% effectiveness, an effectiveness that would wane quickly. This is precisely what was seen. Interestingly, it would also lead to an apparent temporary spike in all cause mortality in the untreated group. Again, this was seen in the data. The effectiveness of the treatment was a statistical trick.
Knowing that the jab would not stop transmission was also easy. Transmission of respiratory viruses occurs within the respiratory mucosa. An injected "vaccine" stimulates the production of systemic antibodies (IgG), rather than mucosal antibodies (IgA). It could be possible for an injected treatment to reduce severe illness, but it does nothing against transmission. A better approach would be to use an ingested "vaccine" that is transmitted to the Peyer's Patches (lymph node like structures in the intestinal tract). These are linked to the respiratory mucosal immune system, which makes perfect sense, because most of the mucous you cough up gets swallowed, your digestive immune system effectively examines what you've coughed up and assists in the development of IgA antibodies, to help protect you from what you're likely to encounter.
We did try to warn them. But we were just called names (sometimes still are) and censored by governments. These fucking morons would do well to be mad at the people who actually stopped us, the ones who were raising the alarm, from actually speaking. Some people who spoke out, particularly medical professionals, paid and continue to pay a very high price.
We told them, and they told us to fuck off. I don't blame the ones who were coerced into getting the jab. But the ones who pushed it and keep pushing it, the ones who continue to call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, those cunts can "get boosted". Fuck them.
Yep, totes concur. For myself the massive disconnect i discerned very early on from all the so called 'experts' and headline repeating normies is that even if the vax did prompt your immune system by the forced introduction of (genetic) spike proteins to produce (IgG) antibodies (thus supposedly reducing severity of illness) it does absolutely nothing to prevent infection and or transmission on an individual level in the first instance - you have to catch it first for the antibodies to do their thing - thus any actual claimed 'benefit' is only possible after positive viral infection, the continual msm/ medical/ political establishment talking heads mantra of 'you wont get sick, you wont pass it on, you wont go to hospital etc etc' was completely and utterly bogus from the start.
My long time family GP told me he would stop asking me and my young sons (emotive harassing more like) to get jabbed if i stopped engaging in 'circlular reasoning' with him. Literally asking him among other very important pertinent things, how could it claimed to be safe if it hadnt even completed any long term safety studies yet - his reply 'Look Its probably better to just get vax now rather than wait for the safety studies just in case you get covid'. totally captured.
How dare you deny your GP his Big Pharma bonus!
Fck him - he got enough out of the rest of my family.
lol that's not even circular logic.... it's just logic.
IKR - that same conversation being repeated every month for almost a year - to him it's circular reasoning if i keep asking the same things in a different way because his establishment narrative replies never address the question asked.
EDIT: Fcker wouldnt even let me or my young sons in the building - they had a bare one room prefab set up in the carpark (zero heater throughout the entire winter) - for active cases and unvaccinated - when i asked why he stated 'The vaccinated might feel uncomfortable sitting in the same room ( with masks on) as an unvaccinated' 'I replied how would they know i'm unvaccinated to feel uncomfortable unless someone disclosed my personal medical information without my consent' I don't think He liked that - just more circular reasoning !!.
(post is archived)