WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

202

So if it's safe and effective, why test for it?

So if it's safe and effective, why test for it?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

No way this will pass.

Also, anyone can propose a bill. This is not evidence that vaxed blood is not safe. No, I am not arguing that it is safe.

There should be a pure blood bloodbank servicing pure bloods. If anyone is interested in starting one with me let me know.

[–] 1 pt

Canbot is right, there's no way that this will pass.

I'm all for the proposal; when "we need to test blood for vaxx because it's not safe" becomes mainstream more fence-sitters shift.

[–] 1 pt

Yes, it's just noise in a sea of noise. Interesting to see it surface for a brief moment, however.