Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

That means they will do things like this again if they can brainwash the public into believing it is necessary.

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

That's exactly what it means.

And by rejecting the case, they avoid ruling one way or the other.

[–] • 1 pt

DING DING DING

That's the thing that normies don't understand, if we don't see heads roll (figuratively speaking, no violence) then these (((banksters))) will do it again. And wouldn't they? Look at how much money and power they got out of it.

[–] • 2 pts

so our freedoms can't be tossed aside at any moment for any contrived reason by the government (who's job it was I thought to protect said freedoms) and we'll have to live under that complete afront to human rights until this bunch of clearly fucking morons decides if they want to "hear" a case regarding an assault on freedoms, but they can just reject whatever they don't want to make a tough call on even tho that's literally their job?

between this and the Texas v. PA case regarding clear election bullshit, i think this version of the country is done. there's quite literally nothing left to preserve. it's all captured by radical fucks who ignore it when they want, but use it like a sledgehammer when it's convenient.

[–] • 1 pt

And...it's not bad enough yet.

Until few people have nothing to lose, people will sit passively by allowing the tyrants to control them. Notice how the Muslims are reacting. They're fighting against the machine.

[–] • 1 pt

i hear you, but i as well as many others have been ahead of the curve for 15+ years, hoping everyday i'd be proven wrong, only to find the masses are more retarded and pussified than I could have imagined.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh yeah. It's been a wild ride.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

wtf

[–] • 4 pts

Pfizer/moderna obviously owns the judges.