(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 3 pts

Big, big milestone here, people. This article was published and does not say the vax is safe. The vax profession of faith was required in the abstract and conclusion - some bullshit like, "novel coronavirus emerged in 2020 and was countered with safe and effective vaccines..." Then the conclusion used to must say, "benefits outweigh the risks," or somesuch. Not today, Satan. Not today. Yes, I did write, "used to must."

Let's start whith the heretical utterances in the...

Conclusion

According to the vaccine study literature, adverse effects have always been part of the mass vaccination strategy, but ultimately the desired effects of the vaccination are more significant. Side effects of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported more frequently in people with a history of immune-related diseases or who are more sensitive to age and physiological conditions. The most important and most common complications are cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (more about AstraZeneca), transverse myelitis (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), Bell's palsy (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca), GBS (more about Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), and the first manifestation of MS (more about Pfizer). Finally, discovering whether these disorders are accidental or whether the vaccine is the main cause of them requires future studies, ongoing efforts to gather evidence, and long-term monitoring.

Strong talk for a science paper. No safety or effectiveness of covid vaccine, just strokes, myelitis, Bell's palsy, MS...

Abstract Excerpt

... Although vaccines are now considered the best way to achieve collective safety and control mortality, due to the critical situation, these vaccines have been issued the emergency use licenses and some of their potential subsequence side effects have been overlooked...

Covid vaccine not hailed as safe, and not a hearty endorsement of effective either in here. Actually, not a fucking word about the ~~95% 93.8% 90% 83% 80% 67% 50% 20% -2% -8% -9%~~ -22% effecaciousness.

Background Excerpt

However, in order to prove the effectiveness of the vaccine in terms of safety and side effects, the implementation of phase 4 of clinical studies is necessary. Because the results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world [5].

We won't say it's safe because there is no long term safety study completed. Also a nice call-out of vaccine delusion and fantasy here: "results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world." They just called the vaxterminators delusional crazy people in the Journal of European Medical Research. Lol.

In all, that was a fairly gratuitous academic tea-bagging of the vax, in my opinion. Some rough treatment, there. I'm sure the authors will be penalized.

Big, big milestone here, people. This article was published and *does not* say the vax is safe. The vax profession of faith was required in the abstract and conclusion - some bullshit like, "novel coronavirus emerged in 2020 and was countered with safe and effective vaccines..." Then the conclusion used to must say, "benefits outweigh the risks," or somesuch. Not today, Satan. Not today. Yes, I did write, "used to must." Let's start whith the heretical utterances in the... #Conclusion >According to the vaccine study literature, adverse effects have always been part of the mass vaccination strategy, but ultimately the desired effects of the vaccination are more significant. Side effects of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported more frequently in people with a history of immune-related diseases or who are more sensitive to age and physiological conditions. The most important and most common complications are cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (more about AstraZeneca), transverse myelitis (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), Bell's palsy (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca), GBS (more about Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), and the first manifestation of MS (more about Pfizer). Finally, discovering whether these disorders are accidental or whether the vaccine is the main cause of them requires future studies, ongoing efforts to gather evidence, and long-term monitoring. Strong talk for a science paper. No safety or effectiveness of covid vaccine, just strokes, myelitis, Bell's palsy, MS... #Abstract Excerpt >... Although vaccines are now considered the best way to achieve collective safety and control mortality, due to the critical situation, these vaccines have been issued the emergency use licenses and some of their potential subsequence side effects have been overlooked... Covid vaccine not hailed as safe, and not a hearty endorsement of effective either in here. Actually, not a fucking word about the ~~95% 93.8% 90% 83% 80% 67% 50% 20% -2% -8% -9%~~ -22% effecaciousness. #Background Excerpt >However, in order to prove the effectiveness of the vaccine in terms of safety and side effects, the implementation of phase 4 of clinical studies is necessary. Because the results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world [5]. We won't say it's safe because there is no long term safety study completed. Also a nice call-out of vaccine delusion and fantasy here: "results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world." They just called the vaxterminators delusional crazy people in the Journal of European Medical Research. Lol. In all, that was a fairly gratuitous academic tea-bagging of the vax, in my opinion. Some rough treatment, there. I'm sure the authors will be penalized.

link