Big, big milestone here, people. This article was published and does not say the vax is safe. The vax profession of faith was required in the abstract and conclusion - some bullshit like, "novel coronavirus emerged in 2020 and was countered with safe and effective vaccines..." Then the conclusion used to must say, "benefits outweigh the risks," or somesuch. Not today, Satan. Not today. Yes, I did write, "used to must."

Let's start whith the heretical utterances in the...

Conclusion

According to the vaccine study literature, adverse effects have always been part of the mass vaccination strategy, but ultimately the desired effects of the vaccination are more significant. Side effects of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported more frequently in people with a history of immune-related diseases or who are more sensitive to age and physiological conditions. The most important and most common complications are cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (more about AstraZeneca), transverse myelitis (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), Bell's palsy (more about Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca), GBS (more about Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson), and the first manifestation of MS (more about Pfizer). Finally, discovering whether these disorders are accidental or whether the vaccine is the main cause of them requires future studies, ongoing efforts to gather evidence, and long-term monitoring.

Strong talk for a science paper. No safety or effectiveness of covid vaccine, just strokes, myelitis, Bell's palsy, MS...

Abstract Excerpt

... Although vaccines are now considered the best way to achieve collective safety and control mortality, due to the critical situation, these vaccines have been issued the emergency use licenses and some of their potential subsequence side effects have been overlooked...

Covid vaccine not hailed as safe, and not a hearty endorsement of effective either in here. Actually, not a fucking word about the 95% 93.8% 90% 83% 80% 67% 50% 20% -2% -8% -9% -22% effecaciousness.

Background Excerpt

However, in order to prove the effectiveness of the vaccine in terms of safety and side effects, the implementation of phase 4 of clinical studies is necessary. Because the results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world [5].

We won't say it's safe because there is no long term safety study completed. Also a nice call-out of vaccine delusion and fantasy here: "results of the phase 4 studies are the proper criteria for how the vaccine works in the real world." They just called the vaxterminators delusional crazy people in the Journal of European Medical Research. Lol.

In all, that was a fairly gratuitous academic tea-bagging of the vax, in my opinion. Some rough treatment, there. I'm sure the authors will be penalized.

This is murky bc you would have to be brain-damaged to take that shit in the first place.

Anyone who got it already had permanent brain damage before getting it

No shit!

Experimental poisonous injections designed to make big pharma billions, stoke fear, destroy morale and create unnecessary loss of life tend to do that.

3 years of lies. 10s of millions of deaths, billions injured and many hundreds more millions of deaths to come.

Then they'll make up a new variant and rinse repeat. Guaranteed same plan as 2020 in an election year. In 2024 new poisons will be invented, the rich get richer and another election gets rigged.

Meanwhile all of the "covid19" deaths mainly killed only the vaccinated. The actual deaths from it were just deaths that kill the elderly every year anyways: common cold, pneumonia and flu.

It is a very informative article and it seems well-sourced. A very dry read, so be prepared, but it explains some complicated things very well.

I wonder how they correct for the cohort confounding that only someone with brain damage would keep taking these jabs?

Realistically the vaccines selected for retards so it is a biased sample.

But it makes sense that in those cases in which the spike protiens made it through the blood brain barrier that it would cause harm.

The linked paper is not a study at all but a review of other papers that have been published. So no new data. And it does not claim that the jab gives everyone brain damage. All it does is review documents about cases in which it did cause brain damage. These could be outliers.