The number of doses against the incidence of infection table is telling. However, unfortunately, I think most people are going to read the results and say 30% is better than nothing. Many with knowledge of medical studies / statistics will just argue that the time from last infection is a major factor and since they didn't provide a combined view of both the number of doses and time from last infection on the same chart, the telling table alone is not indicating the effectiveness of the vaccine. Not showing the data with both factors in the same graph is a convenient gap in this study and many will take the study's multivariable analysis at face value.

What I like about this is that the people who conducted the study truly believed the vaccines had efficacy and they set out to prove it once and for all. They were not in on the scam. They were brain washed themselves.

Those knowingly in on the scam know that you need to avoid any honest comparison of vaccinated versus vaccine free or you will expose the vaccines as harmful.