WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

696

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

There isn't a single instance of the word "graphene" in the patent. Why are you making shit up, OP?

You also missed this:

This application claims the benefit of priority of Israel Patent Application No. 277083 filed on Sep. 1, 2020, Israel Patent Application No. 276665 filed on Aug. 11, 2020, and Israel Patent Application No. 276648 filed on Aug. 11, 2020. The contents of the above applications are all incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein in their entirety.

[–] 1 pt

I wonder what would happen if a person with graphene in their body was placed in an mri machine. I'd like to see that.

[–] 1 pt

It's basically an injected radio tag. A serial number tattooed throughout your body.

[–] 0 pt

Even that wouldn't be feasible, an RFID tag is a passive device requiring input from an antenna, it modifies the signal based on its coding and relays it back. To get anything meaningful beyond a very short string of characters you'd want to use NFC. However, NFC uses a high frequency; high frequencies are much more easily blocked by water which drastically reduces the read range to a few millimeters for a subdermal implant.

To track individuals it would be significantly less costly and suspicious by installing cameras in cities and on roadways or by simply keeping track of cellphones using any number of backdoor coded into them.

[–] 0 pt

While I have little doubt these nanoparticles have other potential intended uses. The whole radio tag thing is indeed accurate. Perhaps a more accurate analogy is in order. When some materials are exposed to UV light they absorb it then emit another color of light. This is how you get blacklight paint. This I believe, absorbs a certain (set of) frequency(s) and then emits a longer wavelength, a new color. The intensity and perhaps "color" will vary from person to person dependant upon method of manufacture, dose, individual biological response, etc. Basically color coding us either in groups or potentially as individuals.

Yes cameras would be easier but, there easy ways to defeat those and I bet that the powers that be were not thinking we would even find out about this yet alone understand it. They really do think we are that stupid. Also, ¿Por qué no los dos? Why not both? Wouldn't you cover all the perceived bases?

[–] 0 pt

No, again it's simply not feasible to even attempt to track people with a subdermal implant; there are way too many flaws with the idea.