WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

657

. . . Important points from this report include:

  • A seven-year-old experienced a stroke.
  • One child and one infant suffered facial paralysis.
  • One infant had a kidney adverse event, either kidney injury or failure.
  • Of the 34 adverse event cases, 24 (71%) were classified as serious.
  • Predominantly female patients were affected — at least 25 of 34 (73.5%) patients.
  • Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals. However, 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were “not consistent with pediatric subjects.”
  • Ages ranged from two months to nine years, with median 4.0 years, which means half the children were under four years of age.
  • 132 adverse events were reported in the 34 children – i.e., an average of 3.88 AEs per child.

Shockingly, Pfizer concluded:

“No new significant safety information was identified based on a review of these cases compared with the non-paediatric population.”

Please read the disturbing, two-page report by the Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) below. . .

>. . . Important points from this report include: >- A seven-year-old experienced a stroke. - One child and one infant suffered facial paralysis. - One infant had a kidney adverse event, either kidney injury or failure. - Of the 34 adverse event cases, 24 (71%) were classified as serious. - Predominantly female patients were affected — at least 25 of 34 (73.5%) patients. - Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals. However, 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were “not consistent with pediatric subjects.” - Ages ranged from two months to nine years, with median 4.0 years, which means half the children were under four years of age. - 132 adverse events were reported in the 34 children – i.e., an average of 3.88 AEs per child. >Shockingly, Pfizer concluded: >>“No new significant safety information was identified based on a review of these cases compared with the non-paediatric population.” >Please read the disturbing, two-page report by the Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) below. . .

(post is archived)