Pfizer had to work really hard to get efficacy results like that. They had to work at the "speed of science" to bring to market a jab that tax payers would not only pay for, but indemnify Pfizer against all claims, to their own detriment, for a product that would, sooner or later kill them. Will it kill them all? Who knows, it seems that carelessness in the manufacture, storage and administration of the jab made it somewhat of a Russian roulette. Some batches were highly effective, killing or maiming many, while others didn't do much at all as they were just slurries of protein soup by the time they were injected.
We've seen these mortality figures repeated in many places. All of which had aggressive jab campaigns. It continues on to this day, in the UK, Australia, NZ, Canada, Germany, etc... I think, probably the next step will be to stop reporting mortality statistics, or at least "homogenize" the dataset, in a similar way that they did to temperature data. Historical mortality data will be adjusted, because clearly people in the old days (like 5 years ago) were just shit at writing down when someone died. They will also increase the gaslighting operation on the few that remain unjabbed.
(post is archived)