He’s not good enough to predict a global pandemic 6 months before it happens
How can anyone logically make such a statement?! He had multiple intelligence communities (some good, some bad) that could make him aware that the plandemic was coming. Bill Gates and Dr. Safe and Effective made numerous articles, collaborations, simulations, plans for a plandemic that anons dug up prior to and early on in the plandemic. WEF, WHO, NIH, etc were warning a plandemic would occur during Trump's term. Trump knew their playbook, knew about the US funded biolabs around the world. Fast tracking the "cure" would prevent a 10 year lockdown and the billions of deaths it would cause on the road to human enslavement.
Long article, I'm still reading it.
Edit - Okay, I've finished it. Noah came to the same conclusions I stated above. Good on him.
Given what you said, that makes him complicit in the (((plan))).
No, he did it to destroy their plan timing such that their grand plan would implode. How's their plandemic working out now? Something like 1.9% of the population are willing to get their 4th booster compared to the millions who lined up for the first clot shot. Accelerating the vax accomplished this, otherwise we would still be locked down/shut down and unable to travel without an up to date vaccination card. Did you read the whole article? It's all in there.
Few battles are perfectly clean in war. Trumps actions may have contributed to the injury or death of thousands (by their own choice to get the vax based on confidence men like Fauci), but in turn he saved the lives of billions.
How's their plandemic working out now?
Hmm, how much emergency power have they relinquished? How many people lost their lives, jobs, family members, homes and freedom due to the (((jab))) policies? How many children have been killed or permanently injured due to the (((vaxx)))? How much has it cost us in terms of human rights, freedoms and economics? Answer those questions and you will see how their (((plandemic))) is working out.
It's interesting to look at the situation through your POV. In order to accelerate the (((vaxx))) to throw off (((their))) timing, a lot of people had to be condemned to death without just cause. No one, especially those who think Trump did it right, likes to talk about the deaths of the innocent who were duped or forced into taking the (((vaxx))). Did Trump sign the EO knowing that a lot of eggs were going to need to be broken in order to make the omelet? Did he care who those eggs were and how many? Where is his remorse for killing so many people with the stroke of a pen? I've never once heard him lament the deaths of children, or anyone, from the forced (((vaxx))) brought about by his rush to disrupt their timeline. I don't think he'll ever acknowledge this.
So yeah, he's apparently good with killing a bunch of random people in order to throw off their timeline instead of signing an EO that puts a moratorium on mRNA (((vaxx))) work. Better to kill lots of innocent people than to kill even one bad guy. For once I'd like to see even one bad guy die for their misdeeds. That would give me a better sense that he was in control and on the side of good. So far I've got no reason to believe he's on the side of good. I have every reason to believe he is on the side of ((())).
But go ahead and tell me I'm wrong and that he's totally winning for us. Say that at the funeral of a child who died from (((vaxx))) induced heart damage. I'd have some respect for you if you had the balls to do that.
Yes.
At this point I fully believe Zognald was complicit in most of the kike globalist plans, including destroying the most fanatic of his own supporters via the Jan 6th trap. After all, he's the one who sent the FBI and National Guard that day and also told the FBI to get them all and destroy their lives.
And he hasn't used even a single cent of the 100s of millions he collects from supporters to help any of them.
That position also requires he had perfect knowledge and wasn't surrounded by people intent on misleading and controlling him. The conditions for such an assumption are absent.
>How can anyone logically make such a statement?!
Exactly.
(post is archived)