Moderna claims that Pfizer vax is the same shit as Moderna.
Pfizer and BioNTech, however, ultimately decided to proceed with a vaccine that has the same exact mRNA chemical modification to its vaccine as Spikevax®.
I feel rather certain that two competing firms would not select that exact turn of phrase to identify this component of their product were it a point of differentiation between them. For this reason I believe that the, "secret sauce," is identical.
Do not inject that shit.
Addendum:
Let me clarify what I learned since old posts about VV vax (AZ+JJ). These do not contain mRNA. They contain DNA which is transposed into RNA to then make spikes. I heard on Darkhorse that DNA vax may not need pseudouridine replaced mRNA because the VV is able to penetrate the cell nucleus. This is not confirmation that VV vax do not result in pseudouridine replaced mRNA - I would believe either. There is pronounced synchronicity of drug design choices that would lead me to conclude DNA designs use pseudo-u unless someone shares some good analysis of this.
Dark horse also mentions that pseudo-u is biologically different and likely influences the resultant protein. Pseudo-u replacement means that the RNA is not actually RNA because pseudo-u is not a valid RNA nucleotide.
Moderna claims that Pfizer vax is the same shit as Moderna.
>Pfizer and BioNTech, however, ultimately decided to proceed with a vaccine that has the same exact mRNA chemical modification to its vaccine as Spikevax®.
[They had millions of alternative mRNAs](https://poal.co/s/Vax/531133)
[I told you these assholes were doing this](https://poal.co/s/TheWuhanFlu/389774)
>I feel rather certain that two competing firms would not select that exact turn of phrase to identify this component of their product were it a point of differentiation between them. For this reason I believe that the, "secret sauce," is identical.
Do not inject that shit.
Addendum:
Let me clarify what I learned since old posts about VV vax (AZ+JJ). These do not contain mRNA. They contain DNA which is transposed into RNA to then make spikes. I heard on Darkhorse that DNA vax may not need pseudouridine replaced mRNA because the VV is able to penetrate the cell nucleus. This is not confirmation that VV vax do not result in pseudouridine replaced mRNA - I would believe either. There is pronounced synchronicity of drug design choices that would lead me to conclude DNA designs use pseudo-u unless someone shares some good analysis of this.
Dark horse also mentions that pseudo-u is biologically different and likely influences the resultant protein. Pseudo-u replacement means that the RNA is not actually RNA because pseudo-u is not a valid RNA nucleotide.
(post is archived)