Your method assumes the clinition knows what's in the substance or the material you read is accurate. I say, few clinicians know: they listen to the Pfizer reps. They assume they're not being lied to by the (((reps))).
I reiterate my position: I don't trust these low information clinicians any more than I trust any politician to represent me with any thought.
In most cases, the data in scientific studies is accurate but the abstract and discussion sections distract from the findings to please their sponsors, and they stop being scientific whenever they rely on statistical magic.
Clinicians should get replaced by the shamans we import together with all the skilled labor and rocket scientists. Shamans would improve the quality of our healthcare systems dramatically.
(post is archived)