WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

463

Hum, 5 vials, no detectable phosphorous. hard to have mRNA without phosphorous. Interesting

Hum, 5 vials, no detectable phosphorous. hard to have mRNA without phosphorous. Interesting

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

if anyone found out the truth, it would create huge vaccine hesitancy.

I wouldn't characterize it as hesitancy but flat out refusal. Frankly, I'm at a point where I don't want any pharmaceuticals. They are all too risky. After reading about fraudulent studies and captured agencies, I'm staying the fuck away from all of them. Not to mention the captured clinicians.

[–] 1 pt

I've chosen a different path: I want to understand the basics of how my body works, and then the mechanisms of action of all the drugs my doctor offers me - or fails to offer me. It's time consuming, but also very interesting.

[–] 1 pt

Your method assumes the clinition knows what's in the substance or the material you read is accurate. I say, few clinicians know: they listen to the Pfizer reps. They assume they're not being lied to by the (((reps))).

I reiterate my position: I don't trust these low information clinicians any more than I trust any politician to represent me with any thought.

[–] 1 pt

In most cases, the data in scientific studies is accurate but the abstract and discussion sections distract from the findings to please their sponsors, and they stop being scientific whenever they rely on statistical magic.

Clinicians should get replaced by the shamans we import together with all the skilled labor and rocket scientists. Shamans would improve the quality of our healthcare systems dramatically.

[–] 2 pts

TLDR: they analyzed five vials from Pfizer and Moderna.

They found lipid nanoparticles, but no mRNA. They know because they would have detected sulfur.

5 out of 5 were blanks.

This gives credence to the "hot lot" theory where some lots have way more fatalities than others..

[–] 2 pts

"He found PEG, but no phosphorus"