At the time, the vaccine proved 90% effective against stopping infections and 100% effective in preventing deaths in the critical trial, matching the performance of Moderna and Pfizer’s mRNA jabs.
So basically they massaged the numbers and lied about the rest of it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vVj5UXbUBU
I have been enjoying watching this guys channel, he seems very data driven, although he is unwilling to name the vax specifically as a cause of excess mortality. But he did mention how in a trail on 6-10 year olds, 3 of the unvaxxed kids got Covid, and 7 of the unvaxxed got it, with symptoms, out of something like 10,000 participants.
I am totally making up these numbers, because I have to go to work soon, but they aren't really hyperbole. Pfizer and Moderna used the numbers like 3 and 7 to justify an efficacy.
Watch the video if you can. This guy explains it in a way better way than some dipshit on the internet ever could.
It did not prevent 100% of deaths, the same number of covid and placebo people died. 1 and 1 (I don't know if that is a rate or absolute count)
Now, there is still the matter of whether vax participants died in day 1-41 after getting first shot because people getting covid in this time range are excluded from the vax group results.
(((Efficacy.)))
(post is archived)