I really appreciate you keeping up with this stuff and posting content.
These are good points. You know me, I like to point out all the bullshit about the vaccines that gets posted on this site.
But this is a good write-up and these are legit points about the vaccines.
This is very dishonest of them to pretend the 3rd dose group, which represented 3% of the COVID-19 cases, can be passed off as legit. In stats, we call this "not representative of the population statistic" hence the very large confidence intervals.
It's junk science. Follow-up science would have to be done before this could pass human trials. We are not in a pandemic: there is no excuse to push this through, anymore - they can take the time to complete a proper human trial.
I appreciate someone stepping up and going "This is what's wrong with that data." Sometimes critical thinking isn't my thing.
But yes, this seems to be a clear case of cherry picking a single point and using "this is because of this" to say it applies everywhere.
(post is archived)