Interesting quote below gets me thinking. Why they aren't creating a new RNA construct to be better and more up to date and effective? You know why... - Better liability shield - They really cannot create an mRNA vax design in two hours - It was never a therapeutic and is not a suitable for improvement as a therapeutic - it is a genocide agent Take your pick. Any or all. >Prasad explained: > >“If a therapy loses efficacy over time, why does that mean the bar to be a therapy is lower? It should mean that we need new therapies. We need a new mRNA construct. Fuck you, poo fake doctor.