WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

I feel 12% is too low to claim it even works at all

[–] 2 pts

That is likely a manipulated number too. There are things you can do to increase error rates, then use that error to claim whatever you want.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Kinda sounds like an 88% failure rate.

But, I also think that a 10% chance of rain is really a 90% chance of no rain.

No wonder people have trouble with percentages!

[–] 1 pt

it it's less effective then Sex Panther Cologne it's pure trash.

[–] 1 pt

As long as the efficacy is statistically significant, it can be claimed it has x% efficacy.

[–] 1 pt

They used fucking young fit adults for the test drug takers.

Ffs they were low risk of covid!

They stacked the outcome. Like testing efficacy of prostate cancer drugs on women