Ok, if it is deadlier for people under 80 how can it be ok for people over 80?
It's not, it's just that your chances of dying from any respiratory disease increases dramatically when you're over 80. A mild cold can kill you at that point. So more people died from the supposed 'vids simply because that's how old people work.
I understand that. What I am trying to point out is something that is so bad for young people surely can't be good for old people, esp. when by "young people" we mean anyone under 80.
That is true, but the article is only speaking about your risk of dying from A vs B.
You could certainly imply that's what it means, but the article doesn't really talk a whole lot about the relative worth of the injections, just the death from cause.
(post is archived)