Note that the analysis assumes that VAERs events are under-reported at a rate of 20 to 1. While it's a reasonable (and IMO generous) assumption, I'd caution against citing this study in an attempt to convince someone who is not already suspicious of the vax.
Note that the analysis assumes that VAERs events are under-reported at a rate of 20 to 1. While it's a reasonable (and IMO generous) assumption, I'd caution against citing this study in an attempt to convince someone who is not already suspicious of the vax.
Absolutely. This is simply another stick to add to the fire. The article is careful to say it's suggested this happens.
Absolutely. This is simply another stick to add to the fire. The article is careful to say it's suggested this happens.
(post is archived)