Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Note that the analysis assumes that VAERs events are under-reported at a rate of 20 to 1. While it's a reasonable (and IMO generous) assumption, I'd caution against citing this study in an attempt to convince someone who is not already suspicious of the vax.

[–] • 0 pt

Absolutely. This is simply another stick to add to the fire. The article is careful to say it's suggested this happens.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Ok, if it is deadlier for people under 80 how can it be ok for people over 80?

[–] • 0 pt

It's not, it's just that your chances of dying from any respiratory disease increases dramatically when you're over 80. A mild cold can kill you at that point. So more people died from the supposed 'vids simply because that's how old people work.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I understand that. What I am trying to point out is something that is so bad for young people surely can't be good for old people, esp. when by "young people" we mean anyone under 80.

[–] • 0 pt

That is true, but the article is only speaking about your risk of dying from A vs B.

You could certainly imply that's what it means, but the article doesn't really talk a whole lot about the relative worth of the injections, just the death from cause.