"His own anecdotal research on such a highly specialized topic carries little to no weight in the overall analysis when measured against the sound medical advice of our public health officials," wrote Justice Nathalie Godbout of the Court of Queen's Bench.

They don't care what you know or have learned. Proof is irrelevant to them against the word of the "experts".

This shit makes me feel ill. I suspect it is there for the purpose of emotionally activating me.

So... I know people that VAX their kids. I judge them for it, and this is no different except for the divorce angle. This is another batch of kids put to the needle, and another case of informed consent violation. If things go horribly wrong then the judge will be sentenced appropriately in the crimes against humanity trial. I am not sure what happens to the mom, but I would not contest the same treatment for her.

Where this whole informed consent thing gets interesting is the Scott Adams argument. If you listened to the news and government you would not have known. If you looked harder you would have a different perception of the risk. To me the mom is culpable for any hypothetical injury having cause to educate herself and failing to do so.

The dad is culpable for marrying that bitch and letting her go out of control.