For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math...variolation for small pox had a better track record and that is 1700's tech for a MUCH deadlier disease. Plus you need boosters how often, with each new booster that risk of death is there again? Natural immunity however seems to work BETTER than the shots and boosters? Why the fuck are you even suggesting it as a good thing?
For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math.
Lowers the risk by 11 percentage points, not 11%. The reduction is 57.7% (18.19% x [1- 57.7%]) = 7.69%.
And yet death is a risk with each additional jab. We can't accurately measure that either because of the "vaccination" status being what 20 or 30 days after jabbed? The definitions of vaccinated throws your numbers off too by the way.
I'm not arguing for the jab. I'm just saying let's not look like idiots out here and give them ammunition to dismiss us.
(post is archived)