The car doesn't run, but that doesn't mean you can't use it to go somewhere.
The car doesn't run, but that doesn't mean you can't use it to go somewhere.
Fucking lol.
Fucking lol.
The 60 minutes special about an overwhelmed Maryland hospital was 100% fake news.
The 60 minutes special about an overwhelmed Maryland hospital was 100% fake news.
Who has any patience left for these fucking morons. The truth about the vax has been out there for almost two years, ever since it was released. It doesn't protect against Covid, it causes more Covid and makes Covid symptoms worse. And that is beside the horrible side effects it causes, the most significant one of which is death.
Who has any patience left for these fucking morons. The truth about the vax has been out there for almost two years, ever since it was released. It doesn't protect against Covid, it causes more Covid and makes Covid symptoms worse. And that is beside the horrible side effects it causes, the most significant one of which is death.
These articles are what's redpilling people, at least in my family, though they are averse to admitting it.
These articles are what's redpilling people, at least in my family, though they are averse to admitting it.
That article is a twisted logicfest.
That article is a twisted logicfest.
That means it's working
That means it's working
I KALL BULLSHIT
I KALL BULLSHIT
>These big pharma shills are funny. They are admitting that the jab does not work without the need to saying it.
>>These big pharma shills are funny. They are admitting that the jab does not work without the need to saying it.
Well, it doesn't.
If 78% of people are vaccinated and 60% of the people in the hospital are vaccinated it means the unvaccinated are twice as likely to be hospitalized.
Take 1,000 people. 780 are vaccinated and 220 are not. Say 100 people are in the hospital, and it's 60 vaccinated people (60%) and 40 unvaccinated people (40%). That means the probability of landing in the hospital is 60 / 780 = 7.69% for vaccinated people and 40 / 220 = 18.19% for the unvaccinated.
Can we try to avoid making ourselves look like morons? If you can't do the math just sit this one out.
Well, it doesn't.
If 78% of people are vaccinated and 60% of the people in the hospital are vaccinated it means the unvaccinated are twice as likely to be hospitalized.
Take 1,000 people. 780 are vaccinated and 220 are not. Say 100 people are in the hospital, and it's 60 vaccinated people (60%) and 40 unvaccinated people (40%). That means the probability of landing in the hospital is 60 / 780 = 7.69% for vaccinated people and 40 / 220 = 18.19% for the unvaccinated.
Can we try to avoid making ourselves look like morons? If you can't do the math just sit this one out.
For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math...variolation for small pox had a better track record and that is 1700's tech for a MUCH deadlier disease. Plus you need boosters how often, with each new booster that risk of death is there again? Natural immunity however seems to work BETTER than the shots and boosters? Why the fuck are you even suggesting it as a good thing?
For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math...variolation for small pox had a better track record and that is 1700's tech for a MUCH deadlier disease. Plus you need boosters how often, with each new booster that risk of death is there again? Natural immunity however seems to work BETTER than the shots and boosters? Why the fuck are you even suggesting it as a good thing?
For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math.
Lowers the risk by 11 percentage points, not 11%. The reduction is 57.7% (18.19% x [1- 57.7%]) = 7.69%.
> For something with the risk of DEATH as a side effect and it lowers the risk of hospitalization by ONLY 11% as compared to the unvaccinated per your math.
Lowers the risk by 11 percentage points, not 11%. The reduction is 57.7% (18.19% x [1- 57.7%]) = 7.69%.
And yet death is a risk with each additional jab. We can't accurately measure that either because of the "vaccination" status being what 20 or 30 days after jabbed? The definitions of vaccinated throws your numbers off too by the way.
And yet death is a risk with each additional jab. We can't accurately measure that either because of the "vaccination" status being what 20 or 30 days after jabbed? The definitions of vaccinated throws your numbers off too by the way.
47 unvaccinated people in ICU vs 18 vaccinated people in ICU in a province of 4.371 million people without any further details of their age, pre-existing conditions, and whether they are hospitalized for COVID or with COVID
If you can't do the math just sit this one out.
>47 unvaccinated people in ICU vs 18 vaccinated people in ICU in a province of 4.371 million people without any further details of their age, pre-existing conditions, and whether they are hospitalized for COVID or with COVID
>If you can't do the math just sit this one out.
(post is archived)