WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Autopsies? And how did they die?

This man is that smart retired Singaporean scientist and medical doctor.

He said "gene based vaccines" but mRNA vaccines are not gene vaccines. They are mRNA vaccines. DNA vaccines are a different tech. I'll mark up this as just a simple misunderstanding of the vaccines since this stuff came out after he retired.

However, where's the data? Where's the research? I don't care about researchers talking about their research. I want to see their research.*

Edit -

*It's on a questionable website, not published in a reputable medical journal, and not peer reviewed by a credentialed professional in that area of research. Damn. Maybe this doctor fell.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

Here are the problems with the research:

Self-selection. The people are family members of the deceased and they had a vested interest to prove vaccines were deadly. You cannot self-select in proper research. They demanded their family members be autopsied because they thought the vaccines killed their family member.

The sample size is 15 people.

J&J and AstraZeneca's vaccines, which are used in the research, are not even an mRNA vaccine. It is a "classic" vaccine that uses a piece of the deactivated virus called an adenovirus.

This is why self-selection research done by non-researcher-fellows not participating in a reputable medical journal, can be used or considered as legit science.

Let's see them do proper research on the deceased with laboratory confirmed tests on infections/illnesses. COVID-19, Flus, etc. Sample size needs to be 3,000 or more and it needs to be a normalized data set. Autoimmune diseases need to be controlled for in the sample set. Self-selection should automatically be eliminated - true simple random sample that is normalized is appropriate.

Is it possible that I am more educated, intelligent, and informed than this retired doctor? Looks like it. That's pretty sad.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

'... "gene based vaccines" but mRNA vaccines are not gene vaccines.' Patently Incorrect. Pfizer/ Moderna m-RNA vaccines are a Gene therapy - FDA (Moderna 2020) also correctly concludes this as well.

The CEO of Merck Pharmaceuticals also correctly describes the m-RNA vaccines as a Gene therapy and Gene editing system, and that without them being described as a ''Vaccine'' the majority of people would simply not have freely accepted to be injected with them for an illness they don't have The differences between gene and protein - Gene and Protein(https://pediaa.com/difference-between-gene-and-protein/)

[–] -1 pt

The CEO of Merck Pharmaceuticals also correctly describes the m-RNA vaccines as a Gene therapy and Gene editing system

Commented on that weeks ago: he's wrong.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

So your contention is that the FDA are wrong also. I strongly doubt you know more about marketing new and emerging Pharmaceutical products than a pharmaceutical CEO. Aside that I wouldn't know what you commented weeks ago. How do you substantiate that he is wrong ??.

It's very clear and obvious - i even provided a non-biased link to show how genes and proteins relate, interact, can be manufactured etc - that m-RNA vaccines are by definition Gene Therapy and Gene editing systems. But hey, you keep shilling for the vaxx man. Two more boosters to christmas.

[–] 0 pt

It is a "classic" vaccine that uses a piece of the deactivated virus called an adenovirus.

Not quite. Adenoviruses are a family of viruses like coronaviruses, rhinoviruses, etc.

[–] 0 pt

The COVID-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson uses existing technology that involves a virus called adenovirus, a common cause of respiratory infections. The DNA in the adenovirus is modified so that it produces a key part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus particle to which the body then develops an immune response. The adenovirus that delivers the SARS-CoV-2 DNA particle cannot multiply, so it does not cause infection. Because this system is based on stable DNA molecules, it does not require ultracold storage, making it easier to distribute.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777172

[–] 1 pt (edited )

So that says that the adenovirus used in the J&J is 'modified DNA to produce a key virus particle'. So it's not a 'classic traditional adenovirus vaccine' at all - it's been modified using the computer AI generated Spike particle that is also used to simulate the Pfizer/ Moderna m-RNA vaccine.

[–] 0 pt

So now you know.